Evaluating the facial esthetic outcomes of digital smile designs generated by artificial intelligence and dental professionals

dc.authorid0000-0003-0768-8779
dc.authorid0000-0001-8833-5259
dc.contributor.authorCeylan, Gülsüm
dc.contributor.authorSayın Özel, Gülsüm
dc.contributor.authorMemişoğlu, Gözde
dc.contributor.authorEmir, Faruk
dc.contributor.authorŞen, Sevgin
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-25T06:58:41Z
dc.date.available2023-08-25T06:58:41Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluates the preference rates for smile designs created by professionals or by Artificial Intelligence (AI) among dentists, dentistry students, and laypeople. Four cases with symmetrical and asymmetrical features were selected based on the Facial Flow (FF) concept from the database of the Smile Designer app regarding anatomical facial points. Two smile designs were created for each selected case: one using Artificial Intelligence (AI) and one created manually. An online survey assessed participants' preferences for the different smile designs. The chi-square test "Pearson's and Fisher's exact test (P)" was used to analyze the survey data. A total of 628 people completed the study. Dentists preferred the manually-created smile design for the first three cases. For Case 4, dentists who used the Smile Designer program preferred the manually-created design (55.88%), while those who did not use the program preferred the AI-generated design (55.84%). There was a significant difference in esthetic perception between dentists and dental students (p = 0.001) and between dentists and laypeople (p = 0.001) for Case 1, only between dentists and dental students (p = 0.003) for Case 2, and only between dentists and laypeople (p = 0.001) for Case 3. Furthermore, we found that females (p = 0.007) and orthodontists (p = 0.025) had a higher preference for the AI-generated design in this case compared to males and other dental specialties for Case 3. While age, education level, and clinical experience did not significantly impact dentists' preference for manually-created or AI-generated smile designs (p > 0.05), our results suggest that there were some differences in preference for Case 3. Overall, our findings suggest that the use of AI-generated smile designs for symmetric faces is acceptable to both dentists and laypeople and can offer time-saving benefits for clinicians.
dc.identifier.citationCeylan, G., Sayın Özel, G., Memişoğlu, G., Emir, F. ve Şen, S. (2023). Evaluating the facial esthetic outcomes of digital smile designs generated by artificial intelligence and dental professionals. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 13(15). https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app13159001
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app13159001
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417
dc.identifier.issue15
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85167875867
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app13159001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/11361
dc.identifier.volume13
dc.identifier.wos001045317900001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.institutionauthorCeylan, Gülsüm
dc.institutionauthorSayın Özel, Gülsüm
dc.institutionauthorMemişoğlu, Gözde
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Sciences (Switzerland)en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectArtificial Intelligence (AI)
dc.subjectDental Esthetic
dc.subjectDigital Smile Design (DSD)
dc.subjectEsthetic Perception
dc.titleEvaluating the facial esthetic outcomes of digital smile designs generated by artificial intelligence and dental professionals
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Ceylan-Gulsum-2023.pdf
Boyut:
2.99 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: