Efficacy of diode laser and gluma on post-preparation sensitivity: Arandomized split-mouth clinical study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKara, Haluk Barış
dc.contributor.authorÇakan, Umut
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Burcu
dc.contributor.authorİnan Kurugöl, Pelin
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:58:06Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:58:06Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.descriptionWOS: 000389845000006
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 27439664
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of a 940-nm diode laser and Gluma desensitizer on post-preparation sensitivity of prepared teeth. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients with 76 teeth participated in the study. For each patient, prepared molar or premolar in one quadrant were individually irradiated by laser. In the symmetrical quadrant, Gluma was applied onto the prepared teeth. No treatment was performed in the control group. Temporary crowns were placed after preparation. Pain response to tactile stimulus was assessed atone day, one week, and two weeks using visual analog scale (VAS). Intergroup comparisons were made with Kruskal Wallis test (p<0.05). Results: MeanVAS scores of the control group were statistically higher than laser and Gluma groups (p<0.017). The difference between VAS scores of the laser and Gluma groups was statistically insignificant (p>0.05). Conclusions: A significant reduction in level of sensitivity after both treatments was observed. The reduction of sensitivity with Gluma was not significantly superior to laser. No significant additional reduction occurred in level of sensitivity from the first day to the second week after both treatments. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The application of Gluma or a 940-nm diode laser may be considered as effective in reducing sensitivity after tooth preparation without superiority of either method.
dc.identifier.citationKara, H. B., Çakan, U., Yılmaz, B. ve İnan Kurugöl, P. (2016). Efficacy of diode laser and gluma on post-preparation sensitivity: Arandomized split-mouth clinical study. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 28(6), 405-411. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12230
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jerd.12230
dc.identifier.endpage411
dc.identifier.issn1496-4155
dc.identifier.issn1708-8240
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage405
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12230
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/3106
dc.identifier.volume28
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectDiode Laser
dc.subjectSensitivity
dc.subjectLaser and Gluma
dc.titleEfficacy of diode laser and gluma on post-preparation sensitivity: Arandomized split-mouth clinical study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Kara, Haluk Baris.pdf
Boyut:
91.47 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu