Good versus poor prescribers: The comparison of prescribing competencies in primary care

dc.authorid0000-0001-8984-9673
dc.authorid0000-0002-8511-6349
dc.authorid0000-0002-9994-5033
dc.contributor.authorAtaç, Ömer
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Volkan
dc.contributor.authorKarabey, Selma
dc.contributor.authorHayran, Osman
dc.contributor.authorAkıcı, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-08T07:06:31Z
dc.date.available2022-04-08T07:06:31Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Halk Sağlığı Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Uluslararası Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Tıbbi Farmakoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.description.abstractAim: To compare the competencies of primary care physicians (PCPs) with poor and good prescribing performance in frequently encountered indications. Background: Primary care centers are one of the mostly visited health facilities by the population for different health issues. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed 6 125 487 prescriptions generated by 1431 PCPs which were selected by systematic sampling in 2016 in Istanbul. We defined PCPs as poor prescriber (n = 227) or good prescriber (n = 210) in terms of their prescribing performance per WHO/INRUD criteria. We compared solo diagnosis prescriptions of these two groups in 'percentage of prescriptions in compliance with clinical guidelines' and also rational prescribing indicators. Findings: Poor prescribers and good prescribers significantly differed in each of the prescribing indicators for their all solo diagnosis prescriptions. Hypertension had the highest difference of the average cost per encounter (Delta = 284.2%) between poor prescribers (US$43.99 +/- 63.05) and good prescribers (US$11.45 +/- 45.0), whereas headache had the highest difference between the groups in the percentage encounters with an antibiotic (14.9% vs. 1.5%). Detailed analysis of the prescribing performances showed significantly higher values of each WHO/INRUD indicators for all examined diagnoses. We found significantly higher percentages of guideline-compliant drugs in good prescribers compared to that in poor prescribers in hypertension (40.8% vs 34.8%), tonsillopharyngitis (57.9% vs 50.7%), and acute sinusitis (46.4% vs 43.6%). Conclusion: This study shows that the prescribing performances of PCPs are not rational enough in terms of drug selection and prescription content. Furthermore, even the physicians who have good prescribing practice appear as not satisfactorily rational in compliance with current pharmacotherapy competencies.
dc.identifier.citationAtaç, Ö., Aydın, V., Karabey, S., Hayran, O. ve Akıcı, A. (2022). Good versus poor prescribers: The comparison of prescribing competencies in primary care. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423622000111
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1463423622000111
dc.identifier.issn1463-4236
dc.identifier.issn1477-1128
dc.identifier.pmid35343414
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85127302958
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423622000111
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/9258
dc.identifier.volume23
dc.identifier.wos000773489700001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorAtaç, Ömer
dc.institutionauthorAydın, Volkan
dc.institutionauthorHayran, Osman
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCambridge University Press
dc.relation.ispartofPrimary Health Care Research & Developmenten_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectDiagnosis
dc.subjectPharmacotherapy
dc.subjectPhysicians
dc.subjectPrescribing Performance
dc.subjectPrimary Care
dc.subjectRational Use of Medicine
dc.titleGood versus poor prescribers: The comparison of prescribing competencies in primary care
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Atac-Omer-2022.pdf
Boyut:
467.8 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: