Yazar "Ayhan, Ali" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
  • Küçük Resim
    Öğe
    Basit histerektomi sonrası tanı alan serviks kanserlerine güncel yaklaşım
    (Türk Jinekolojik Onkoloji Derneği, 2014) Güngördük, Kemal; Özdemir, İsa Aykut; Şahbaz, Ahmet; Dursun, Polat; Gökçü, Mehmet; Sancı, Muzaffer; Köse, Faruk; Ayhan, Ali
    Servikal kanser, tüm dünyada jinekolojik kanserlere bağlı ölümlerin önde gelen nedenlerindendir. Pap smear taramasının yaygın kullanımı ile servikal kanser erken tanısı artmaktadır. Ancak, ihmalden ya da olguların yetersiz değerlendirilmesinden dolayı servi-kal kanser tanısı retrospektif olarak histerektomi sonrası konabilmektedir. Radikal parametrektomi ve radyoterapi, basit histerek-tomi sonrası tanı alan servikal kanser olgularındaki iki tedavi modalitesidir. Bu çalışmada, histerektomi sonrası tanı alan servikal kanser olgularının nedenleri, tedavi modaliteleri ve prognozları hakkında kapsamlı bilgi vermeyi hedefledik.
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Could the long-term oncological safety of laparoscopic surgery in low risk endometrial cancer be also valid for the high intermediate and high-risk patients? A multi-center Turkish gynecologic oncology group study conducted with 2745 endometrial cancer cases
    (BMJ Publishing Group, 2019) Vardar, Mehmet Ali; Güzel, Ahmet Barış; Taşkın, Selen; Güngör, Mete; Özgül, Nejat; Salman, Coşkun; Küçükgöz Güleç, Ümran; Khatib, Ghada; Dunder, Ivan; Ortaç, Fırat; Yüce, Kutluay; Terek, Coşan Mustafa; Şimşek, Tayup; Özsaran, Aydın; Taşkıran, Çağatay; Onan, Anıl Mehmet; Çoban, Gonca; Topuz, Samet; Demirkıran, Fulya; Takmaz, Özgüç; Köse, Mehmet Faruk; Göçmen, Ahmet; Seydaoğlu, Gülşah; Gümürdülü, Derya; Ayhan, Ali
    [Abstract Not Available]
  • Küçük Resim
    Öğe
    Could the long-term oncological safety of laparoscopic surgery in low-risk endometrial cancer also be valid for the high–intermediate-and high-risk patients? A multi-center turkish gynecologic oncology group study conducted with 2745 endometrial cancer cases. (TRSGO-End-001)
    (MDPI, 2021) Vardar, Mehmet Ali; Güzel, Ahmet Barış; Taşkın, Selen; Güngör, Mete; Özgül, Nejat; Salman, Coşkun; Küçükgöz Güleç, Ümran; Khatib, Ghada; Taşkıran, Çağatay; Dünder, İlkkan; Ortaç, Fırat; Yüce, Kunter; Terek, Coşan; Şimşek, Tayup; Özsaran, Aydın; Onan, Anıl; Çoban, Gonca; Topuz, Samet; Demirkıran, Fuat; Takmaz, Özgüç; Köse, Mehmet Faruk; Göçmen, Ahmet; Seydaoğlu, Gülşah; Gümürdülü, Derya; Ayhan, Ali
    This study was conducted to compare the long-term oncological outcomes of laparotomy and laparoscopic surgeries in endometrial cancer under the light of the 2016 ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification system, with particular focus on the high–intermediate-and high-risk categories. Using multicentric databases between January 2005 and January 2016, disease-free and overall survivals of 2745 endometrial cancer cases were compared according to the surgery route (laparotomy vs. laparoscopy). The high–intermediate-and high-risk patients were defined with respect to the 2016 ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification system, and they were analyzed with respect to differences in survival rates. Of the 2745 patients, 1743 (63.5%) were operated by laparotomy, and the remaining were operated with laparoscopy. The total numbers of high–intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer cases were 734 (45%) patients in the laparotomy group and 307 (30.7%) patients in the laparoscopy group. Disease-free and overall survivals were not statistically different when compared between laparoscopy and laparotomy groups in terms of low-, intermediate-, high–intermediateand high-risk endometrial cancer. In conclusion, regardless of the endometrial cancer risk category, long-term oncological outcomes of the laparoscopic approach were found to be comparable to those treated with laparotomy. Our results are encouraging to consider laparoscopic surgery for high–intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer cases.