Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChoong, Simon
dc.contributor.authorde la Rosette, Jean J. M. C. H.
dc.contributor.authorDenstedt, John
dc.contributor.authorZeng, Guohua
dc.contributor.authorSarıca, Kemal
dc.contributor.authorMazzon, Giorgio
dc.contributor.authorSaltirov, Iliya
dc.contributor.authorPal, Shashi Kumar
dc.contributor.authorAgrawal, Madhu
dc.contributor.authorDesai, Janak
dc.contributor.authorPetrik, Aleš
dc.contributor.authorBuchholz, Noor
dc.contributor.authorMaroclo, Marcus V.
dc.contributor.authorGordon, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorSridhar, Ashwin
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-04T07:34:23Z
dc.date.available2022-01-04T07:34:23Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.citationChoong, S., de la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H., Denstedt, J., Zeng, G., Sarıca, K., Mazzon, G. ... Sridhar, A. (2022). Classification and standardized reporting of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): International alliance of urolithiasis (IAU) consensus statements. Minerva Urology and Nephrology, 74(1), 110-118. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04107-7en_US
dc.identifier.issn1827-1758
dc.identifier.issn0393-2249
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04107-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/8753
dc.description.abstractBackground: To reach a consensus in the classification and standardized reporting for the different types of PCNLs. Methods: The RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology was used to reach a consensus. Thirty-two statements were formulated reviewing the literature on guidelines and consensus on PCNLs, and included procedure specific details, outcome measurements and a classification for PCNLs. Experts were invited to two rounds of input, the first enabled independent modifications of the proposed statements and provided the option to add statements. The second round facilitated scoring of all statements. Each statement was discussed in the third round to decide which statements to include. Any suggestion or disagreement was debated and discussed to reach a consensual agreement. Results: Twenty-five recommendations were identified to provide standardised reporting of procedure and outcomes. Consensual scoring above 80% were strongly agreed upon by the panel. The top treatment related outcomes were size of sheath used (99.1%) and position for PCNL (93.5%). The highest ranked Outcome Measures included definition of post-operative hospital length of stay (94.4%) and estimated blood loss (93.5%). Conclusions: The consensus statements will be useful to clarify operative technique, in the design of clinical trials and standardized reporting, and presentation of results to compare outcomes of different types of PCNLs.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectInternational Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU)en_US
dc.subjectStandardized Reporting of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)en_US
dc.subjectClassificationen_US
dc.titleClassification and standardized reporting of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): International alliance of urolithiasis (IAU) consensus statementsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMinerva Urology and Nephrologyen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Uluslararası Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Üroloji Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-6308-1763en_US
dc.identifier.volume74en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage110en_US
dc.identifier.endpage118en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04107-7en_US
dc.identifier.wos000768297300014en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85126389670en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33439573en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record