Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGöksoy, Beslen
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Gökhan
dc.contributor.authorAzamat, İbrahim Fethi
dc.contributor.authorÖzata, İbrahim Halil
dc.contributor.authorDuman, Kazım
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-03T13:27:52Z
dc.date.available2022-01-03T13:27:52Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationGöksoy, B., Yılmaz, G., Azamat, İ. F., Özata, İ. H. ve Duman, K. (2021). Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair-TAPP versus TEP: Results of 301 consecutive patients. Surgical Technology International, 39, 191-195. https://doi.org/10.52198/21.STI.39.HR1427en_US
dc.identifier.issn1090-3941
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.52198/21.STI.39.HR1427
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/8749
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair are the two most commonly used techniques in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, and the results of comparative studies are conflicting. The objective of this study is to compare the two methods in unilateral inguinal hernia repair. Materials and methods: The data of consecutive patients who underwent TEP and TAPP due to unilateral inguinal hernia between December 7, 2017, and March 15, 2020, were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome was to compare the clinical outcomes of the two techniques in terms of complications, conversion, pain, and operative time. The secondary outcome was recurrence rates. Results: A total of 301 (TEP n=234, TAPP n=67) patients were included in the study. The mean age was 43 years, and the follow-up period was two years. The groups were similar in terms of demographic characteristics and hernia type. The mean operative time was longer in the TAPP group than in the TEP group (67 min and 58 min, p=0.007). The recurrence rate was 4.3% in the TEP group and 5.9% in the TAPP group (p>0.05). The conversion rate was 6% in both groups. In total, 19 (6.3%) patients had intraoperative complications (TEP n=16, TAPP n=3), and 23 (7.6%) patients had postoperative complications (TEP n=16, TAPP n=7). Both intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were similar between the groups (p=0.31 and p=0.051, respectively). The early postoperative pain was less in the TEP group (p=0.004). Conclusion: Less early postoperative pain and shorter operative time were detected in patients who underwent TEP.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWorld Journal of Surgeryen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectRepair-TAPP Versus TEPen_US
dc.subjectInguinal Herniaen_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopicen_US
dc.titleLaparoscopic inguinal hernia repair-TAPP versus TEP: Results of 301 consecutive patientsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSurgical Technology Internationalen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Genel Cerrahi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-0889-9586en_US
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.startpage191en_US
dc.identifier.endpage195en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.52198/21.STI.39.HR1427en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster