Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAmaresh, M.
dc.contributor.authorHegde, P.
dc.contributor.authorChawla, A.
dc.contributor.authorde la Rosette, Jean J. M. C. H.
dc.contributor.authordel Pilar Laguna Pes, Maria
dc.contributor.authorKriplani, A.
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T07:20:54Z
dc.date.available2021-11-03T07:20:54Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationAmaresh, M., Hegde, P., Chawla, A., de la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H., del Pilar Laguna Pes, M. ve Kriplani, A. (2021). Safety and efficacy of superior calyceal access versus inferior calyceal access for pelvic and/or lower calyceal renal calculi- A prospective observational comparative study. World Journal of Urology, 39(6), 2155-2161. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03409-3en_US
dc.identifier.issn0724-4983
dc.identifier.issn1433-8726
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03409-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/8549
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare efficacy and safety between superior calyceal access and inferior calyceal access for pelvic and/or lower calyceal renal stones. Methods: Consecutive patients presenting with Pelvic and/or inferior calyceal renal calculi were allocated to the superior calyceal access (group 1) or inferior calyceal access (group 2) treatment arm. Allocation of treatment access was based on the surgeon's preference. Variables studied included stone free rate, operating time, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Statistical analysis was executed using SPSS, Version 16.0. The statistical significance was evaluated at 5% level of significance (p value < 0.05). Results: Between July 2018 and February 2019, 63 patients were included in each group. The percutaneous inserted guidewire entered the ureter in 92% in group1 and 74.6% in group 2 (p = 0.034). Stone fragments migrated to the middle calyx in 3.2% in group1 and 9.5% in group 2 (p = 0.033). A second puncture was required in one patient in group 1 and in 5 patients in group 2 (p = 0.04). The operative duration (minutes) was 13.46 ± 1.09 in the group 1 while 16.58 ± 1.44 in the group 2 (p = 0.002). Thoracic complications (hydropneumothorax) occurred to 2 patients in superior calyceal access group managed with intercostal tube drainage (p = 0.243).Post operatively blood transfusion was required in two patients in group 2 (p = 0.169). Angioembolization was done in one patient among the inferior calyceal access approach (p = 0.683). Complete stone clearance assessed at 3 months was 96.8% in group 1 and 85.7% in group 2 (p = 0.046). Conclusions: Superior calyceal access is a safe and most efficacious in terms of achieving complete stone clearance rate with reduced operative time, minimal blood loss, less need for a second puncture and auxiliary procedures at minimal complications.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectPCNLen_US
dc.subjectRenalen_US
dc.subjectCalculien_US
dc.subjectPercutaneous Nephrolithotomyen_US
dc.subjectSuperior Calyxen_US
dc.subjectInferior Calyxen_US
dc.subjectAccessen_US
dc.titleSafety and efficacy of superior calyceal access versus inferior calyceal access for pelvic and/or lower calyceal renal calculi- A prospective observational comparative studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Journal of Urologyen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Üroloji Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Uluslararası Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Üroloji Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-6308-1763en_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-0906-4417en_US
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2155en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2161en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00345-020-03409-3en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aksi belirtilmediği sürece bu öğenin lisansı: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess