Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGündoğar, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorSezgin, Güzide Pelin
dc.contributor.authorSönmez Kaplan, Sema
dc.contributor.authorÖzyürek, Hande
dc.contributor.authorUslu, Gülşah
dc.contributor.authorÖzyürek, Taha
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-07T08:52:48Z
dc.date.available2021-04-07T08:52:48Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationGündoğar, M., Sezgin, G. P., Sönmez Kaplan, S., Özyürek, H., Uslu, G. ve Özyürek, T. (2021). Postoperative pain after different irrigation activation techniques: A randomized, clinical trial. Odontology, 109(2), 385-392. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00553-5en_US
dc.identifier.issn1618-1247
dc.identifier.issn1618-1255
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10266-020-00553-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/6711
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of irrigation activation techniques on postoperative pain (PP) in mandibular premolar teeth with irreversible pulpitis after single-visit endodontic treatment. A total of 160 patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis were included in this prospective randomized clinical study. Four different activation methods were used in mandibular premolar teeth. In group 1, teeth were irrigated with side-port endodontic needles (NI) without any agitation; in groups 2 and 3, sonic activation was performed using EDDY and EndoActivator (EA), respectively; and in group 4, passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) was used. Patients' analgesic intake-as well as pain intensity during and after treatment-were recorded at 8, 24, 48 h and 7 days. The data relating to age, sex and analgesic intake was evaluated using the Chi-square test and the preoperative pain and PP intensity at different time intervals was evaluated with the Kruskal-Wallis test at a 5% significance level. Highest PP was recorded at 8 h, pain intensity decreased in all groups by the time. Pain in the NI group was found higher than that of EDDY group at 24 h (P < 0.05). EA and PUI had caused mild pain and had similar pain scores at 24 h. (P > 0.05). No statistically difference was found among the groups with regard to analgesic intake (P > 0.05). Although there were slight differences in PP levels between the groups at 24 h, pain levels decreased in all groups after 24 h. Activation of the irrigation solution did not make any difference in terms of PP after 24 h.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnalgesic Intakeen_US
dc.subjectEDDYen_US
dc.subjectEndoactivatoren_US
dc.subjectPassive Ultrasonic Irrigationen_US
dc.subjectPostoperative Painen_US
dc.titlePostoperative pain after different irrigation activation techniques: A randomized, clinical trialen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOdontologyen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-8656-7101en_US
dc.identifier.volume109en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage385en_US
dc.identifier.endpage392en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10266-020-00553-5en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster