Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorMünevveroğlu, Çağlar
dc.contributor.authorGündüz, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-14T05:48:47Z
dc.date.available2020-05-14T05:48:47Z
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.citationMünevveroğlu, Ç. ve Gündüz, M. (2020). Postoperative pain management for circumcision; Comparison of frequently used methods. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(2), 91-95. https://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.2.505en_US
dc.identifier.issn1682-024X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/5223
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.2.505
dc.description.abstractObjective: To determine the ideal method for postoperative pain management after circumcision by comparing the most frequently used different methods like; dorsal penile block, caudal epidural block, subcutaneous ring block, intravenous paracetamol and intravenous tramadol HCl.Methods: Between May 1st 2015 to May 1st 2016, 500 children between 2-10 year old were circumcised at the department of pediatric surgery of Istanbul Medipol University Health Care Practice & Research Center Sefakoy Hospital. Five groups were formed according to postoperative analgesia methods which were planned to be compared; Group-I. penile block, Group-II. Caudal epidural block, Group-III. subcutaneous ring block, Group-IV as intravenous paracetamol and Group-V as intravenous tramadol HCl. In order to evaluate the postoperative pain levels of children, Children's Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) was filled at 30, 60, 120, 180 minutes after circumcision by a researcher who does not know which method was applied.Results: No significant difference is found between the groups (p>0.05). In the statistical analysis, no significant difference was found in the effect of analgesia methods on CHEOPS scores between 30, 60, 120 and 180 minutes (p>0.05). In parallel with this result, no significant difference was found in the effect of heart beat rates and respiration rate averages between 30, 60, 120 and 180 minutes (p>0.05).Conclusion: It has been shown that none of the five method has any superiority in reducing pain after circumcision and that all five methods can be used. However, we think that side effects of regional anesthesia and systemic analgesic applications should not be ignored.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherProfessional Medical Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 Unported*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/*
dc.subjectAnalgesia Methodsen_US
dc.subjectCHEOPSen_US
dc.subjectCircumcisionen_US
dc.subjectPostoperative Painen_US
dc.titlePostoperative pain management for circumcision; Comparison of frequently used methodsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPakistan Journal of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Çocuk Cerrahisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-4479-3404en_US
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage91en_US
dc.identifier.endpage95en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.12669/pjms.36.2.505en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aksi belirtilmediği sürece bu öğenin lisansı: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess