• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace@Medipol
  • Fakülteler
  • Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi
  • Makale Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace@Medipol
  • Fakülteler
  • Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi
  • Makale Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The influence of the attachment type and implant number supporting mandibular overdentures on stress distribution: An in vitro study, part I

Thumbnail

View/Open

Tam Metin/Full Text (660.6Kb)

Access

info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess

Date

2013

Author

Bilhan Arat, Selda
Bilhan, Hakan
Bozdağ, Ergün
Sünbüloğlu, Emin
Baykasoğlu, Cengiz
Kutay, Ömer

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

Bilhan Arat, S., Bilhan, H., Bozdağ, E., Sünbüloğlu, E., Baykasoğlu, C. ve Kutay, Ö. (2013). The influence of the attachment type and implant number supporting mandibular overdentures on stress distribution: An in vitro study, part I. Implant Dentistry, 22(1), 39-48. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31827774ee

Abstract

Objectives: The main goal of this study was to compare the stress distribution of mandibular overdentures (OVD) with different numbers of supporting implants and single versus splinted attachment types. Materials and Methods: Four different biting situations were simulated for the 2-, 3-, and 4-implant retentive anchor as well as bar attachment OVDs on a formalinfixed cadaver mandible, and strains were recorded under vertical loading of 100 N. Results: The calculated von Mises values from measured strains in all measurement sites and loading conditions for nonsplinted attachments (retentive anchor) were higher than splinted (bar) attachments. Conclusions: It may be concluded that in cases with low quality and quantity of bone, the increase in number of implants and the use of a splinted attachment should be preferred to reduce forces emerging around the implants during function. The use of 2 single attachments in cases with good bone quality and ideal size implants still seems to be a safe and sufficient solution for the treatment of mandibular edentulism with OVDs. (Implant Dent 2013;22:39–48)

WoS Q Kategorisi

Q3

xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-scopusquality

Q2

Source

Implant Dentistry

Volume

22

Issue

1

URI

https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31827774ee
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/5143

Collections

  • Makale Koleksiyonu [518]
  • PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [3772]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [5815]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [5982]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Guide | Contact |

DSpace@Medipol

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsInstitution AuthorORCIDTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryWoS Q ValueScopus Q ValuePublisherAccess TypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsInstitution AuthorORCIDTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryWoS Q ValueScopus Q ValuePublisherAccess Type

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Google Analytics Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Guide || Library || İstanbul Medipol University || OAI-PMH ||

Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı, İstabul, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact: [email protected]

Creative Commons License
DSpace@Medipol by İstanbul Medipol University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Medipol:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.