dc.contributor.author | Şişmanoğlu, Soner | |
dc.contributor.author | Gürcan, Aliye Tuğçe | |
dc.contributor.author | Yıldırım-Bilmez, Zuhal | |
dc.contributor.author | Gümüştaş, Burak | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-02-26T08:44:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-02-26T08:44:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Şişmanoğlu, S., Gürcan, A. T., Yıldırım-Bilmez, Z. ve Gümüştaş, B. (2020). Efficacy of different surface treatments and universal adhesives on the microtensile bond strength of bulk-fill composite repair. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 34(10), 1115-1127. http://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2019.1698202 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0169-4243 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1568-5616 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2019.1698202 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/4954 | |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments and aging on the microtensile bond strength (mu TBS) of bulk-fill composite resins. Bulk-fill composites (Filtek One; 3M ESPE) randomly received five different surface treatments: (1) no treatment, control, (2) 37% phosphoric acid etching (PA), (3) 9% hydrofluoric acid etching (HF), (4) air-borne particle abrasion with 50-mu m alumina particles (Al2O3), (5) tribochemical silica coating (CoJet). Following, the specimens were divided into three subgroups according to universal adhesive applied: Clearfil Universal Bond (CU; Kuraray), Prime&Bond Universal (PBU; Dentsply Sirona), or Single Bond Universal (SBU; 3M ESPE). A nanofill composite (Filtek Ultimate; 3M ESPE) was employed as a repair. Bonded specimens were stored in water for 24 h at 37 degrees C or thermal aged, then subjected to the mu TBS test. Additionally, specimens were analyzed with a contact profilometer and were evaluated with scanning electron microscopy. Control and PA treatments were showed the lowest mu TBS (p < 0.05), and there was no significant difference between these two groups (p > 0.05). Al2O3 and CoJet treatments generally exhibited a similar influence on mu TBS values. In addition, a correlation was found between surface roughness and bond strength (r = 0.831). CoJet resulted in significantly higher repair mu TBS values when compared to the other surface treatments. In addition, the use of silane-containing universal adhesive was increased the cohesive failure rate and maintained the repair mu TBS values after thermocycling. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor and Francis Ltd. | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Universal Adhesives | en_US |
dc.subject | Bulk-Fill Composites | en_US |
dc.subject | Resin Composites | en_US |
dc.subject | Durability | en_US |
dc.subject | Bond Strength | en_US |
dc.title | Efficacy of different surface treatments and universal adhesives on the microtensile bond strength of bulk-fill composite repair | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology | en_US |
dc.department | İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0002-7538-1763 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 34 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 10 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 1115 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 1127 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/01694243.2019.1698202 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | en_US |