Enamel formation genes influence enamel microhardness before and after cariogenic challenge

View/ Open
Access
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAttribution 2.0 Internationalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/Date
2012Author
Shimizu, TakehikoHo, Bao
Deeley, Kathleen
Briseno-Ruiz, Jessica
Faraco, Italo Medeiros
Schupack, Brett Ian
Brancher, Joäo Armando
Pecharki, Giovana Daniela
Küchler, Erika Calvano
Tannure, Patrícia Nivoloni
Lips, Andrea
Vieira, Thays Cristinedos Santos
Patır, Aslı
Yıldırım, Mine
Poletta, Fernando Adrián
Mereb, Juan Carlos
Resick, Judith M.
Brandon, Carla A.
Orioli, Ieda M.
Castilla, Eduardo Enrique
Marazita, Mary Louise
Seymen, Figen
Costa, Marcelo Costra
Granjeiro, José Mauro
Trevilatto, Paula Cristina
Vieira, Alexandre Rezende
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Shimizu, T., Ho, B., Deeley, K., Briseno-Ruiz, J., Faraco, I. M., Schupack, B. I. ... Vieira, A. R. (2012). Enamel formation genes influence enamel microhardness before and after cariogenic challenge. PLOS One, 7(9). https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045022Abstract
There is evidence for a genetic component in caries susceptibility, and studies in humans have suggested that variation in enamel formation genes may contribute to caries. For the present study, we used DNA samples collected from 1,831 individuals from various population data sets. Single nucleotide polymorphism markers were genotyped in selected genes (ameloblastin, amelogenin, enamelin, tuftelin, and tuftelin interacting protein 11) that influence enamel formation. Allele and genotype frequencies were compared between groups with distinct caries experience. Associations with caries experience can be detected but they are not necessarily replicated in all population groups and the most expressive results was for a marker in AMELX (p = 0.0007). To help interpret these results, we evaluated if enamel microhardness changes under simulated cariogenic challenges are associated with genetic variations in these same genes. After creating an artificial caries lesion, associations could be seen between genetic variation in TUFT1 (p = 0.006) and TUIP11 (p = 0.0006) with enamel microhardness. Our results suggest that the influence of genetic variation of enamel formation genes may influence the dynamic interactions between the enamel surface and the oral cavity.