Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorFakhr, Masoud Saadat
dc.contributor.authorMozafari, Mahya
dc.contributor.authorRezvanfar, Kiana
dc.contributor.authorAmini, Zahra
dc.contributor.authorAmiri, Koosha
dc.contributor.authorHosseini, Reza Shah
dc.contributor.authorSarnaz, Hengame
dc.contributor.authorGholami, Poorya
dc.contributor.authorLavasani, Zohreh
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-29T09:15:24Z
dc.date.available2024-05-29T09:15:24Z
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.citationFakhr, M. S., Mozafari, M., Rezvanfar, K., Amini, Z., Amiri, K., Hosseini, R. S. ... Lavasani, Z. (2024). Investigating the risk factors for isthmocele development after cesarean delivery. AJOG Global Reports, 4(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100299en_US
dc.identifier.issn2666-5778
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100299
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/12529
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Cesarean delivery rates are increasing globally, raising concerns about associated complications such as isthmocele. Isthmoceles are pouch-like defects in the anterior uterine wall at the site of a prior cesarean delivery scar. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine isthmocele prevalence, associated symptoms, and risk factors among women with a history of cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional study evaluated 297 women with prior cesarean delivery using transvaginal ultrasound to screen for isthmocele. Data on demographics, pregnancy details, comorbidities, and indications for cesarean delivery were collected. Isthmocele was defined sonographically as any niche or defect at the hysterotomy site. Descriptive and comparative analyses identified factors associated with isthmocele. RESULTS: Isthmocele prevalence was 65.3% (n=194). Abnormal vaginal bleeding was reported in 21.1% of participants, pelvic pain by 4.1% of participants, and both by 4.1% of participants. Compared to women without isthmocele, those with isthmocele were older (35.9 vs 31.6 years), had higher body mass index (26.8 vs 25.5 kg/m2), gravidity (1.8 vs 1.3), and parity (1.7 vs 1.2). Repeat cesarean delivery was more common (30.4% vs 12.6%) and elective cesarean delivery less common (33.5% vs 67.9%) among those with isthmocele. CONCLUSION: Over half of the women with history of cesarean delivery had an isthmocele. Abnormal bleeding was common. Advanced maternal age, obesity, repeat procedures, and certain comorbidities appear to increase risk. Further research on prevention and treatment is warranted given the high prevalence.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAbnormal Uterine Bleedingen_US
dc.subjectCesarean Deliveryen_US
dc.subjectCesarean Scar Defecten_US
dc.subjectIsthmoceleen_US
dc.subjectUterine Nicheen_US
dc.titleInvestigating the risk factors for isthmocele development after cesarean deliveryen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAJOG Global Reportsen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesien_US
dc.identifier.volume4en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100299en_US
dc.institutionauthorHosseini, Reza Shah
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85191885596en_US
dc.identifier.pmid38725541en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aksi belirtilmediği sürece bu öğenin lisansı: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess