Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKılıç, Aylin
dc.contributor.authorÖzpınar, Ayşe
dc.contributor.authorTanrıverdi, Cafer
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-08T07:35:24Z
dc.date.available2023-09-08T07:35:24Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.citationKılıç, A., Özpınar, A. ve Tanrıverdi, C. (2023). Comparison of visual outcomes of two trifocal IOLs. Journal of Refractive Surgery, 39(8), 524-530. https://dx.doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20230424-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1081-597X
dc.identifier.issn1938-2391
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20230424-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/11395
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE:To compare the visual outcomes of bilateral im-plantation of two commercially available trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) (AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOL; Alcon Laboratories, Inc and AcrivaUD Trinova IOL; VSY Biotechnology). METHODS:This comparative, investigator-initiated, single-center randomized trial was conducted by the Department of Ophthal-mology of the Medipol Mega University Hospital in Istanbul, Tur-key. Adult patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio using a block randomization program to undergo cataract surgery and receive the implantation of either the PanOptix or Trinova IOL in both eyes. Outcome measures including binocular uncorrected and cor-rected visual acuities at distance, intermediate (66 cm), and near (40 cm), defocus curve, refractive outcomes, contrast sensitivity, glare and halos, and patient satisfaction were assessed at a mini-mum of 3 months following bilateral IOL implantation. RESULTS:A total of 71 patients (142 eyes) were included, with 35 patients (70 eyes) in the PanOptix IOL group and 36 patients (72 eyes) in the Trinova IOL group. At the 3-month follow-up examination, mean distance-corrected intermedi-ate visual acuity (primary endpoint) was significantly better for the PanOptix IOL group (0.0 & PLUSMN; 0.09 logMAR) compared with the Trinova IOL group (0.01 & PLUSMN; 0.10 logMAR) (P = .0304). Mean logMAR uncorrected intermediate acuity (UIVA) and near (UNVA) visual acuity were also significantly better for the PanOptix IOL group (UIVA = 0.1 & PLUSMN; 0.10 logMAR; UNVA= 0.0 & PLUSMN; 0.09 logMAR) compared with the Trinova IOL group (UIVA = 0.2 & PLUSMN; 0.10 logMAR; UNVA = 0.2 & PLUSMN; 0.11 logMAR) (both P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences in all other outcomes between groups. No adverse events were reported in both groups. CONCLUSIONS:These results suggest that the PanOptix IOL provides better intermediate and near visual outcomes com-pared to the Trinova IOL and represents a good choice for pa-tients seeking to achieve spectacle independence.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAlcon Laboratories, Incen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSlack Incorporateden_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectIOLsen_US
dc.subjectVisual Outcomesen_US
dc.subjectOphthalmologyen_US
dc.titleComparison of visual outcomes of two trifocal IOLsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Refractive Surgeryen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Göz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-8880-0026en_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-4373-7400en_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-2445-6339en_US
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.startpage524en_US
dc.identifier.endpage530en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3928/1081597X-20230424-01en_US
dc.institutionauthorKılıç, Aylin
dc.institutionauthorÖzpınar, Ayşe
dc.institutionauthorTanrıverdi, Cafer
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.wos001051410300004en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85168932912en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37578176en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster