Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTönge, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorYazıcı, Ömer
dc.contributor.authorİpek, Veyselkarani
dc.contributor.authorAcar Demir, Hilal
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-14T10:41:38Z
dc.date.available2023-07-14T10:41:38Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.citationTönge, M., Yazıcı, Ö., İpek, V. ve Acar Demir, H. (2022). Dosimetric phantom consistency of TMR-10 protocol in homogeneous and inhomogeneous regions in gamma knife radiosurgery planning. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, 62(4), 88-94. https://doi.org/10.14744/hnhj.2022.04372en_US
dc.identifier.issn2630-5720
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14744/hnhj.2022.04372
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/11200
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The algorithms used in the GammaPlan treatment planning system are “Tissue Maximum Ratio (TMR) classical,”“TMR 10,” and “convolution” algorithms, respectively. In this study, the consistency of dosimetric measurements with the TMR 10 protocol used in SRC (stereotactic radiosurgery) planning in lesions located in homogeneous and inhomogeneous regions in different intracranial location scenarios was investigated. Methods: In this study, the accuracy of administration of multiple metastasis treatment on the Gamma Knife Perfexion device was investigated. Computed tomography was performed with 1 mm cross-section intervals of CIRS brand Atom randofantoma. Critical organs and three different brain metastases located in homogeneous and heterogeneous regions, which are not on the same plane with each other, were drawn on the phantom. Planned target volume (PTV) volumes were created without margining the drawn gross tumor volumes, and three separate plans were made for three different PTV volumes. All plans were calculated using the TMR 10 algorithm. Critical organ doses were kept below the brain-SRC criteria for all calculated plans. Gafchromic EBT-3 film was placed on the sections with the target volume drawn on the phantoms and irradiated (1600 cGy, 50% isodose area). Measurements were made three times. The measured film results and the doses calculated from the planning were compared with gamma index analysis for different tolerance values. Results: In our study, for three different lesions planned and irradiated with different gradient index values, a difference of 2.11–9.58% was observed between the values calculated with the TMR-10 protocol and the values obtained in the dosimet- ric measurement. A decrease in consistency was observed, especially in inhomogeneous region placements. Discussion and Conclusion: There may be inconsistency between the TMR-10 protocol and actual dosimetric measurements, especially around inhomogeneous intracranial structures. We hope that this inconsistency will decrease in the future with the developing dose calculation protocols.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherHaydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospitalen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectDosimetryen_US
dc.subjectGamma Knifeen_US
dc.subjectGammaplanen_US
dc.subjectRadiosurgeryen_US
dc.subjectTMR-10 Algorithmen_US
dc.titleDosimetric phantom consistency of TMR-10 protocol in homogeneous and inhomogeneous regions in gamma knife radiosurgery planningen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofHaydarpaşa Numune Medical Journalen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Beyin ve Sinir Cerrahisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Radyasyon Onkolojisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-0106-9363en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-9732-4241en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-8617-9958en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-3936-080Xen_US
dc.identifier.volume62en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage88en_US
dc.identifier.endpage94en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/hnhj.2022.04372en_US
dc.institutionauthorTönge, Mehmet
dc.institutionauthorYazıcı, Ömer
dc.institutionauthorİpek, Veyselkarani
dc.institutionauthorAcar Demir, Hilal
dc.identifier.trdizinid1176661en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aksi belirtilmediği sürece bu öğenin lisansı: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess