Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTemiz, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorÇelik Özen, Duygu
dc.contributor.authorDuman, Şuayip Burak
dc.contributor.authorBayrakdar, İbrahim Şevki
dc.contributor.authorKazan, Orhan
dc.contributor.authorJagtap, Rohan
dc.contributor.authorAltun, Oğuzhan
dc.contributor.authorZ. Abdelkarim, Ahmed
dc.contributor.authorSyed, Ali Z.
dc.contributor.authorOrhan, Kaan
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-20T07:46:25Z
dc.date.available2023-06-20T07:46:25Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.citationTemiz, M., Çelik Özen, D., Duman, Ş. B., Bayrakdar, İ. Ş., Kazan, O., Jagtap, R. ... Orhan, K. (2023). Morphometric and morphological evaluation of mastoid emissary canal using cone-beam computed tomography. Science Progress, 106(2). https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00368504231178382en_US
dc.identifier.issn0036-8504
dc.identifier.issn2047-7163
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00368504231178382
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/11109
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aimed to determine mastoid emissary canal’s (MEC) and mastoid foramen (MF) prevalence and morphometric characteristics on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images to underline its clinical significance and discuss its surgical consequences. Methods: In the retrospective analysis, two oral and maxillofacial radiologists analyzed the CBCT images of 135 patients (270 sides). The biggest MF and MEC were measured in the images evaluated in MultiPlanar Reconstruction (MPR) views. The MF and MEC mean diameters were calculated. The mastoid foramina number was recorded. The prevalence of MF was studied according to gender and side of the patient. Results: The overall prevalence of MEC and MF was 119 (88.1%). The prevalence of MEC and MF is 55.5% in females and 44.5% in males. MEC and MF were identified as bilateral in 80 patients (67.20%) and unilateral in 39 patients (32.80%). The mean diameter of MF was 2.4 ± 0.9 mm. The mean height of MF was 2.3 ± 0.9. The mean diameter of the MEC was 2.1 ± 0.8, and the mean height of the MEC was 2.1 ± 0.8. There is a statistical difference between the genders (p = 0.043) in foramen diameter. Males had a significantly larger mean diameter of MF in comparison to females. Conclusion: MEC and MF must be evaluated thoroughly if the surgery is contemplated. Radiologists and surgeons should be aware of mastoid emissary canal morphology, variations, clinical relevance, and surgical consequences while operating in the suboccipital and mastoid areas to avoid unexpected and catastrophic complications. CBCT may be a reliable imaging diagnostic technique.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Ltden_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectCranial Emissary Foramenen_US
dc.subjectMastoid Emissary Canalen_US
dc.subjectCone-Beam Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectOral and Maxillofacial Radiologyen_US
dc.subjectDentistryen_US
dc.titleMorphometric and morphological evaluation of mastoid emissary canal using cone-beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofScience Progressen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-9536-0938en_US
dc.identifier.volume106en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/00368504231178382en_US
dc.institutionauthorTemiz, Mustafa
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.wos001005277300001en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85160969652en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37262004en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aksi belirtilmediği sürece bu öğenin lisansı: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess