Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYalçın, Naime
dc.contributor.authorKamilçelebi, Nurdan
dc.contributor.authorŞahin, Ayça Sultan
dc.contributor.authorSandal, Barış
dc.contributor.authorDerbent, Abdurrahim
dc.contributor.authorSalihoğlu, Ziya
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-05T12:31:24Z
dc.date.available2023-06-05T12:31:24Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.citationYalçın, N., Kamilçelebi, N., Şahin, A. S., Sandal, B., Derbent, A. ve Salihoğlu, Z. (2023). Procedural sedation protocols with or without ketamine in pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy: A retrospective cohort study. Comprehensive Medicine, 15(2), 112-119. https://doi.org/10.14744/cm.2023.47965en_US
dc.identifier.issn2822-6771
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14744/cm.2023.47965
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/11026
dc.description.abstractObjective: A considerable difference exists in pediatric endoscopy sedation practices with the optimal sedation protocol for gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy a subject of controversy and to investigate the safety and efficacy of sedation protocols with or without ketamine in procedural sedation for pediatric GI endoscopy. Materials and Methods: A total of 78 pediatric patients who received sedation anesthesia for GI endoscopy were included in this retrospective study. Anesthesia parameters include duration time, doses of anesthetic agents, Ramsay sedation score, respiratory and hemodynamic parameters, recovery time, modified Aldrete recovery scores, and side effects. Study parameters were evaluated with respect to ketamine dose (no ketamine group (NKG), low-dose ketamine group (LDKG, ≤0.75 mg/kg), and high-dose ketamine group (HDKG, ≥1 mg/kg). Results: The upper GI endoscopy rate (58.12% vs. 90.0%, p=0.001) was significantly lower in LDKG versus HDKG. No significant changes were observed in blood pressure levels, oxygen saturation, or heart rate compared to baseline levels. No significant difference was noted between study groups in terms of recovery time, modified Aldrete recovery scores, and nausea/vomiting. Final Ramsay sedation scores were significantly higher in NKG (p<0.05) and LDKG (p<0.01) than in HDKG. Conclusion: Our findings indicate a favorable safety and efficacy profile for ketamine as a useful adjunct to procedural sedation for pediatric GI endoscopy, enabling better quality of sedation with a low risk of cardiorespiratory suppression, or serious complications.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKare Publishingen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectChildrenen_US
dc.subjectGastrointestinal Endoscopyen_US
dc.subjectKetamineen_US
dc.subjectPatient Safetyen_US
dc.titleProcedural sedation protocols with or without ketamine in pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy: A retrospective cohort studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofComprehensive Medicineen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid000-0003-4741-7877en_US
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage112en_US
dc.identifier.endpage119en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/cm.2023.47965en_US
dc.institutionauthorKamilçelebi, Nurdan
dc.identifier.trdizinid1178918en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess