Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorOrdueri, Tuğçe Merve
dc.contributor.authorAteş, Mehmet Muzaffer
dc.contributor.authorÖzcan, Mutlu
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-24T08:10:56Z
dc.date.available2023-03-24T08:10:56Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.citationOrdueri, T. M., Ateş, M. M. ve Özcan, M. (2023). Assessment of intra-oral repair systems for veneered zirconia and zirconia only. Materials, 16(4). https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16041407en_US
dc.identifier.issn1996-1944
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16041407
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/10687
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare bond strength resin composites to porcelain laminate veneers in the indirect repair method to composite resins used in the direct repair method for cases of porcelain veneer fracture of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. In the study, the groups were formed with different percentages of areas to be repaired to mimic porcelain fractures in the mouth. The experimental group of veneered zirconia were as follows: Group A = 100% Zr surface; Group B = 70% Zr, 30% porcelain surface; Group C = 50% Zr, 50% porcelain surface; Group D = 30% Zr, 70% porcelain surface; Group E = 100% porcelain surface. The repairs of the specimens were made using composite resin systems in half of the groups and using porcelain laminate veneers in the other half. Specimens were embedded in acrylic blocks before surface treatments and repairs were applied. After surface conditioning, laminate veneers were applied to the first half of the groups, and composite repair systems were applied to the second half of the groups. After all specimens were aged by thermal cycling, their bond strength values were measured using a Universal Testing Machine, and the obtained data were recorded. The specimens were examined with a stereomicroscope and classified according to failure types (adhesive/cohesive/mixed). Bond strength values were evaluated based on independent-samples t-test statistics. According to the comparisons among the groups, the bond strength of the indirect repairs made with the laminate material was higher than the bond strength of the repairs made with the composite. There was a statistically significant difference in favor of the indirect repair groups among all groups except for Group C. The highest bond strength was found in Group A in the indirect repair method, while the lowest bond was found in the direct repair method in Group E. Adhesive failure was mostly seen in the groups that were repaired with the composite.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectBond Strengthen_US
dc.subjectDental Materialsen_US
dc.subjectDirect Porcelain Repairen_US
dc.subjectIndirect Porcelain Repairen_US
dc.subjectZirconiaen_US
dc.subjectProsthodonticsen_US
dc.titleAssessment of intra-oral repair systems for veneered zirconia and zirconia onlyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMaterialsen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-7238-9102en_US
dc.authoridAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ma16041407en_US
dc.institutionauthorOrdueri, Tuğçe Merve
dc.institutionauthorAteş, Mehmet Muzaffer
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.wos000940653700001en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85149166659en_US
dc.identifier.pmid36837036en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aksi belirtilmediği sürece bu öğenin lisansı: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess