Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSolhi, Mehdi
dc.contributor.authorSak Masrı, Meryem
dc.contributor.authorŞahin, Şeyda
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Hanife Selin
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-22T10:52:30Z
dc.date.available2020-12-22T10:52:30Z
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.citationSolhi, M., Sak Masrı, M., Şahin, Ş. ve Yılmaz, H. S. (2020). Evaluation of the English language coursebooks used at the Turkish public elementary schools. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(3), 1282-1308. https://dx.doi.org/10.17263/jlls.803714en_US
dc.identifier.issn1305-578X
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.17263/jlls.803714
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/6131
dc.description.abstractThis study sought to evaluate the English language coursebooks used at the Turkish public elementary schools. In so doing, a series of coursebooks used in English courses of the curriculum prepared by the Turkish Ministry of National Education were evaluated, using Tomlinson and Masuhara's (2013) set of coursebook evaluation universal criteria. Results indicated that the layout, listening skill, illustrations in use, and affective engagement are the positive traits of the coursebooks, while the negative features outnumber the positive traits. The evaluation indicated that the Turkish public elementary English coursebooks are void of a number of important aspects of language acquisition, including communication-based activities, continuation of using English outside of the classroom, discovery enhancing input and most importantly extensive exposure to English. The central focus of the coursebooks is on the accuracy and repetition rather than effective outcomes, meaningful communication and long term language acquisition. Most activities in all coursebooks contain practice activities, with no place for productivity and autonomy on the part of the students. Additionally, there is no sufficient personalization and the coursebooks fail to make use of what students bring to classroom. Nor are the learners required to think critically, creatively or analytically in most of the activities. The coursebooks do not encourage learners to continue learning English by themselves, thus lacks encouragement for autonomy as well. The activities are designed to practice language items within the classroom environments. Hence, learning does not go beyond the classroom environment with the help of the coursebooks. Nor do the coursebooks guide or encourage learners to make discoveries by themselves. The bombardment of repetitive practice activities that only assess accuracy does not seem to be able to lead to long-term acquisition of English.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSelcuk Universityen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCoursebooksen_US
dc.subjectCoursebooks Evaluationen_US
dc.subjectPublic Schoolsen_US
dc.subjectEnglish Deficiten_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the English language coursebooks used at the Turkish public elementary schoolsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Language and Linguistic Studiesen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Yabancı Diller Eğitimien_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-0355-9171en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-2032-4825en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-7729-5941en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-5979-1594en_US
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1282en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1308en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.17263/jlls.803714en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster