Peripheral vs. central cannulation in cardiac reoperations: Technical considerations and outcomes
![Thumbnail](/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.12511/5779/Ata%2c%20Emin%20Can-2020.pdf.jpg?sequence=7&isAllowed=y)
View/ Open
Access
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Date
2020Author
Ata, Emin CanErkanlı, Korhan
Ulukan, Mustafa Özer
Yıldız, Yahya
Türkoğlu, Halil
Paslı, Sedat
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Ata, E. C., Erkanlı, K., Ulukan, M. Ö., Yıldız, Y., Türkoğlu, H. ve Paslı, S. (2020). Peripheral vs. central cannulation in cardiac reoperations: Technical considerations and outcomes. Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 35(4), 420-426. https://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0445Abstract
Objective: To compare peripheral and central cannulation techniques in cardiac reoperation.Methods: This retrospective study included 258 patients undergoing cardiac reoperation between January 2013 and July 2018. Patients were divided into two groups according to the cannulation type. The first group included 145 (56.2%) patients operated with standard central cannulation through aorta and right atrium or bicaval cannulation. In this group, cardiopulmonary bypass was instituted after sternotomy. The second group consisted of 113 (43.8%) patients operated with peripheral cannulation through femoral artery, vein, and internal jugular vein. In this group, cardiopulmonary bypass was started before sternotomy and after systemic heparinisation. The two groups' operative complications and postoperative outcomes were compared.Results: Procedure-related injury was higher in the central cannulation group than in the peripheral cannulation group (8.3% vs. 1.8%, respectively, P=0.038). Cardiopulmonary bypass time was shorter in the central cannulation group (P=0.008) and total operation time was similar between the groups (P=0.115). Postoperative red blood cell requirement was higher with central cannulation (P=0.004). Operative mortality (2.8% vs. 0, P=0.186), hospital mortality (4.3% vs. 2.7%, P=0.523), and one-year survival rate (90.3% vs. 94.7%, P=0.202) were similar between the groups.Conclusion: Peripheral cannulation reduces cardiac injury and blood transfusion in cardiac reoperation. The cannulation type does not affect postoperative complication, mortality, and one-year survival.
WoS Q Kategorisi
Q4xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-scopusquality
Q3Source
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular SurgeryVolume
35Issue
4Collections
- Makale Koleksiyonu [3790]
- PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [4251]
- Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6601]
- WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6677]
The following license files are associated with this item: