Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorYuluǧ, Burak
dc.contributor.authorIşık, Doğan
dc.contributor.authorÇankaya, Şeyda
dc.contributor.authorÖktem, Ece Özdemir
dc.contributor.authorHanoğlu, Lütfü
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-25T05:51:35Z
dc.date.available2019-12-25T05:51:35Z
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.citationYuluğ, B., Işık, D., Çankaya, Ş., Öktem, E. Ö. ve Hanoǧlu, L. (2019). More evidence for headache and spontaneous glabellar ecchymosis: Does the headache type or the treatment response matter? A neurovascular hypothesis. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 73(5), 284-284. http://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.12827en_US
dc.identifier.issn1323-1316
dc.identifier.issn1440-1819
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.12827
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/4663
dc.description.abstractWe present a 37-year-old man with erythema-like lesions, which devel-oped after two different headache episodes that had not responded tosumatriptan treatment and gradually resolved over the next few days. Thepatient provided a signed release for this publication.Thefirst type of headache was throbbing and pulsatile, lasting for80 min about 3–4 times per month with minimal nausea and right eyetearing; the headache was located occasionally at the right eye and fore-head and was associated with multiple episodes of superior glabellarecchymosis. The patient also reported a second type of treatment-refractory headache that was moderate in severity, pulsatile, andbifrontally located and was not associated with autonomicfindings butgradually progressed to very severe pulsatile headaches that resulted insignificant glabellar ecchymosis (Fig. S1). He disclosed habitual rubbingof the forehead or face during pain episodes, making an‘artificial’post-traumatic skin ecchymosis unlikely.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSpontaneousen_US
dc.subjectHypothesisen_US
dc.subjectEcchymosisen_US
dc.titleMore evidence for headache and spontaneous glabellar ecchymosis: Does the headache type or the treatment response matter? A neurovascular hypothesisen_US
dc.typeletteren_US
dc.relation.ispartofPsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciencesen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Ruh Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Nöroloji Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-4292-5717en_US
dc.identifier.volume73en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage284en_US
dc.identifier.endpage284en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/pcn.12827en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster