dc.contributor.author | Altay, Bülent | |
dc.contributor.author | Erkurt, Bülent | |
dc.contributor.author | Kiremit, Murat Can | |
dc.contributor.author | Horuz, Rahim | |
dc.contributor.author | Güzelburç, Vahit | |
dc.contributor.author | Albayrak, Selami | |
dc.date.accessioned | 10.07.201910:49:13 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-10T20:04:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 10.07.201910:49:13 | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-10T20:04:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Altay, B., Erkurt, B., Kiremit, M. C., Horuz, R., Güzelburç, V. ve Albayrak, S. (2015). A comparison of 120 W laser photoselective vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for bladder outlet obstruction by prostate cancer. Urologia Internationalis, 94(3), 326-329. https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000366209 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0042-1138 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1423-0399 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000366209 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/4046 | |
dc.description | WOS: 000352882700010 | en_US |
dc.description | PubMed ID: 25721931 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To compare the mid-term outcomes of photoselective vaporization of prostate (PVP) with GreenLight HPS 120 W laser and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men with prostate cancer (CaP). Patients and Methods: Seventy four patients with locally advanced (T3/T4) CaP with severe LUTS or acute urinary retention (AUR) were allocated to TURP (n = 36) or PVP (n = 38). International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS), maximum flow rates (Qmax) and post-void residual volumes (V-res), PSA levels, prostate volumes, complications, catheter removal and hospitalization periods were recorded. Patients were reassessed at 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: The catheter removal time was significantly longer in the TURP group (3.8 +/- 1.1 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.7 days, p = 0.02), whereas failure of initial voiding trial was higher in PVP (2.7 vs. 13.1%, p = 0.01). No significant difference in IPSS, Qmax and V-res values was observed within the follow-up period between two groups. A significant difference in urethral stricture rate (8.3 vs. 0%), catheter removal time (3.8 +/- 11 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.7 days) and hospital stay ( 2.9 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.5 days) was observed in favor of PVP. Conclusions: Palliative PVP is very safe and effective by means of symptomatic relief in patients with locally advanced CaP. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Karger | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Photoselective Vaporization of Prostate | en_US |
dc.subject | Transurethral Resection of the Prostate | en_US |
dc.subject | Prostate Cancer | en_US |
dc.subject | Bladder Outlet Obstruction | en_US |
dc.subject | Urinary Retention | en_US |
dc.title | A comparison of 120 W laser photoselective vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for bladder outlet obstruction by prostate cancer | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Urologia Internationalis | en_US |
dc.department | İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Üroloji Ana Bilim Dalı | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0001-8014-2321 | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0001-9988-2944 | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0001-8014-2321 | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0002-4245-7506 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 94 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 326 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 329 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1159/000366209 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | en_US |