Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAltay, Bülent
dc.contributor.authorErkurt, Bülent
dc.contributor.authorKiremit, Murat Can
dc.contributor.authorHoruz, Rahim
dc.contributor.authorGüzelburç, Vahit
dc.contributor.authorAlbayrak, Selami
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T20:04:25Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T20:04:25Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.citationAltay, B., Erkurt, B., Kiremit, M. C., Horuz, R., Güzelburç, V. ve Albayrak, S. (2015). A comparison of 120 W laser photoselective vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for bladder outlet obstruction by prostate cancer. Urologia Internationalis, 94(3), 326-329. https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000366209en_US
dc.identifier.issn0042-1138
dc.identifier.issn1423-0399
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000366209
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/4046
dc.descriptionWOS: 000352882700010en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 25721931en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the mid-term outcomes of photoselective vaporization of prostate (PVP) with GreenLight HPS 120 W laser and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men with prostate cancer (CaP). Patients and Methods: Seventy four patients with locally advanced (T3/T4) CaP with severe LUTS or acute urinary retention (AUR) were allocated to TURP (n = 36) or PVP (n = 38). International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS), maximum flow rates (Qmax) and post-void residual volumes (V-res), PSA levels, prostate volumes, complications, catheter removal and hospitalization periods were recorded. Patients were reassessed at 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: The catheter removal time was significantly longer in the TURP group (3.8 +/- 1.1 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.7 days, p = 0.02), whereas failure of initial voiding trial was higher in PVP (2.7 vs. 13.1%, p = 0.01). No significant difference in IPSS, Qmax and V-res values was observed within the follow-up period between two groups. A significant difference in urethral stricture rate (8.3 vs. 0%), catheter removal time (3.8 +/- 11 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.7 days) and hospital stay ( 2.9 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.5 days) was observed in favor of PVP. Conclusions: Palliative PVP is very safe and effective by means of symptomatic relief in patients with locally advanced CaP.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKargeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPhotoselective Vaporization of Prostateen_US
dc.subjectTransurethral Resection of the Prostateen_US
dc.subjectProstate Canceren_US
dc.subjectBladder Outlet Obstructionen_US
dc.subjectUrinary Retentionen_US
dc.titleA comparison of 120 W laser photoselective vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for bladder outlet obstruction by prostate canceren_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUrologia Internationalisen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Üroloji Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-8014-2321en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-9988-2944en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-8014-2321en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-4245-7506en_US
dc.identifier.volume94en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage326en_US
dc.identifier.endpage329en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000366209en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster