Influence of endodontic access cavity design on mechanical properties of a first mandibular premolar tooth: a finite element analysis study
![Thumbnail](/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.12511/12766/G%c3%bcndo%c4%9far-Mustafa-2024.pdf.jpg?sequence=4&isAllowed=y)
View/ Open
Access
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDate
2024Author
Özyürek, TahaUslu, Gülşah
Arıcan, Burçin
Gündoğar, Mustafa
Nekoofar, Mohammad Hossein
Dummer, Paul Michael Howell
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Özyürek, T., Uslu, G., Arıcan, B., Gündoğar, M., Nekoofar, M. H. ve Dummer, P. M. H. (2024). Influence of endodontic access cavity design on mechanical properties of a first mandibular premolar tooth: a finite element analysis study. Clinical Oral Investigations, 28(8). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05808-xAbstract
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the influence of access cavity designs on the mechanical properties of a single-rooted mandibular first premolar tooth under various static loads using a finite element analysis. Materials and methods: 3-dimensional FEA designs were modeled according to the access cavity designs: an intact tooth (control), traditional access cavity (TEC-I), traditional access cavity with Class-II mesio-occlusal cavity design (TEC-II), conservative access cavity (CEC), ninja access cavity (NEC), caries-driven access cavity (Cd-EC), buccal access cavity (BEC) and bucco-occlusal access cavity (BOEC). After the simulated access cavity preparations, root canal treatment was simulated and three different static loads which mimicked oblique and vertical mastication forces were applied to the models. The stress distribution and maximum Von Misses stress values were recorded. The maximum stress values were obtained on both enamel and dentin under multi-point vertical loads. Results: The maximum stress values were obtained on both enamel and dentin under multi-point vertical loads. Under all load types, the minimum stress distribution was observed in the control group, followed by CEC, NEC and BEC designs. The highest stress concentration was detected in Cd-EC and TEC-II designs. Under single-point vertical loading, the stress was mostly concentrated in the lingual PCD area, while under multi-point vertical loading, the entire root surface was stress-loaded except for the lingual apical third of the root. Conclusion: Preserving tooth tissue by simulating CEC, NEC and BEC access cavities increased the load capacity of a single-rooted mandibular first premolar following simulated endodontic treatment.