Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAydın, Mehmet Şerif
dc.contributor.authorYiğit, Esra Nur
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-14T09:19:09Z
dc.date.available2023-11-14T09:19:09Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.citationAydın, M. Ş. ve Yiğit, E. N. (2023). Comparison of the efficiencies of intrathecal and intraganglionic injections in mouse dorsal root ganglion. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 53(5), 1358-1366. https://dx.doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5702en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-0144
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5702
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/11774
dc.description.abstractBackground/aim: Dorsal root ganglia (DRG) are structures containing primary sensory neurons. Intraganglionic (IG) and intrathecal (IT) applications are the most common methods used for viral vector transfer to DRG. We aim to compare the efficiencies and pathological effects of IT and IG viral vector delivery methods to DRG, through in vivo imaging. Materials and methods: Mice were divided into four groups of six each: IT, IG, IT-vehicle, and IG-vehicle. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) injection was performed for EGFP expression in IT/IG groups. DRGs were made visible through vertebral window surgery and visualized with multiphoton microscopy. After imaging, spinal cords and DRGs were removed and cleared, then imaged with light sheet microscopy. Results: No neuronal death was observed after IT injection, while the death rate was 17% 24 h after IG injection. EGFP expression efficiencies were 90%–95% of neurons in both groups. EGFP expression was only observed in targeted L2 DRG after IG injection, while it was observed in DRGs located between L1-L5 levels after IT injection. Conclusion: IT injection is a more suitable method for labeling DRG neurons in neurodegenerative injury models. However, when the innervation of DRG needs to be specifically studied, IT injection reduces this specificity due to its spread. In these studies, IG injection is the most suitable method for labeling single DRG neurons.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTurkiye Kliniklerien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectDorsal Root Ganglionen_US
dc.subjectIntraganglionic Injectionen_US
dc.subjectIntrathecal Injectionen_US
dc.subjectMultiphoton Microscopyen_US
dc.titleComparison of the efficiencies of intrathecal and intraganglionic injections in mouse dorsal root ganglionen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Rektörlük, Rejeneratif ve Restoratif Tıp Araştırmaları Merkezi (REMER)en_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Rektörlük, Sağlık Bilim ve Teknolojileri Araştırma Enstitüsüen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-6393-1465en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-9037-5217en_US
dc.identifier.volume53en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1358en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1366en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.55730/1300-0144.5702en_US
dc.institutionauthorAydın, Mehmet Şerif
dc.institutionauthorYiğit, Esra Nur
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85175526302en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aksi belirtilmediği sürece bu öğenin lisansı: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess