Meropenem versus piperacillin-tazobactam for definitive treatment of bloodstream infections caused by AmpC beta-lactamase-producing enterobacter spp, citrobacter freundii, morganella morganii, providencia spp, or serratia marcescens: A pilot multicenter randomized controlled trial (MERINO-2)
View/ Open
Access
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Date
2021Author
Stewart, Adam G.Paterson, David L.
Young, Barnaby
Lye, David C.
Davis, Joshua S.
Schneider, Kellie
Yılmaz, Mesut
Dinleyici, Rümeysa
Runnegar, Naomi
Henderson, Andrew
Archuleta, Sophia
Kalimuddin, Shirin
Forde, Brian M.
Chatfield, Mark D.
Bauer, Michelle J.
Lipman, Jeffrey
Harris-Brown, Tiffany
Harris, Patrick N. A.
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Stewart, A. G., Paterson, D. L., Young, B., Lye, D. C., Davis, J. S., Schneider, K. ... Harris, P. N. A. (2021). Meropenem versus piperacillin-tazobactam for definitive treatment of bloodstream ınfections caused by AmpC beta-lactamase-producing enterobacter spp, citrobacter freundii, morganella morganii, providencia spp, or serratia marcescens: A pilot multicenter randomized controlled trial (MERINO-2). Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 8(8). https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab387Abstract
Background: Carbapenems are recommended treatment for serious infections caused by AmpC-producing gram-negative bacteria but can select for carbapenem resistance. Piperacillin-tazobactam may be a suitable alternative. Methods: We enrolled adult patients with bloodstream infection due to chromosomal AmpC producers in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients were assigned 1:1 to receive piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g every 6 hours or meropenem 1 g every 8 hours. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of death, clinical failure, microbiological failure, and microbiological relapse at 30 days. Results: Seventy-two patients underwent randomization and were included in the primary analysis population. Eleven of 38 patients (29%) randomized to piperacillin-tazobactam met the primary outcome compared with 7 of 34 patients (21%) in the meropenem group (risk difference, 8% [95% confidence interval {CI},-12% to 28%]). Effects were consistent in an analysis of the per-protocol population. Within the subcomponents of the primary outcome, 5 of 38 (13%) experienced microbiological failure in the piperacillin-tazobactam group compared to 0 of 34 patients (0%) in the meropenem group (risk difference, 13% [95% CI, 2% to 24%]). In contrast, 0% vs 9% of microbiological relapses were seen in the piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem arms, respectively. Susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem using broth microdilution was found in 96.5% and 100% of isolates, respectively. The most common AmpC β-lactamase genes identified were blaCMY-2, blaDHA-17, blaCMH-3, and blaACT-17. No ESBL, OXA, or other carbapenemase genes were identified. Conclusions: Among patients with bloodstream infection due to AmpC producers, piperacillin-tazobactam may lead to more microbiological failures, although fewer microbiological relapses were seen. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02437045.
WoS Q Kategorisi
Q2xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-scopusquality
Q1Source
Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVolume
8Issue
8Collections
- Makale Koleksiyonu [3801]
- PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [4264]
- Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6620]
- WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6696]