Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAkbulut, Aslıhan
dc.contributor.authorBallı Akgöl, Beyza
dc.contributor.authorOrhan, Kaan
dc.contributor.authorBayram, Merve
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-20T05:55:36Z
dc.date.available2021-08-20T05:55:36Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationAkbulut, A., Ballı Akgöl, B., Orhan, K. ve Bayram, M. (2021). Assessment of dehiscence and fenestration in children and adolescents using cone beam computed tomography. Dentistry 3000, 9(1). https://dx.doi.org/10.5195/D3000.2021.143en_US
dc.identifier.issn2167-8677
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.5195/D3000.2021.143
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/7888
dc.description.abstractObjective: To define the prevalence of dehiscence and fenestration and classify them in terms of the localization of fenestrations in a random sampled group of children and adolescent patients using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: CBCT performed at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology of patients referred by the paediatric dentistry clinic were included in this retrospective study. Image evaluations were performed by dentomaxillofacial radiologist (AA, asst. prof.), and these images were examined in three dimensions of the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes. Intraexaminer agreement for the evaluations were found acceptable. The presence/absence of dehiscence and/or fenestration, fenestration's classification type, and localization of defects were recorded. Moreover, the presence/absence of periapical lesion in related root with dehiscence and fenestration was noted. For statistical analysis, The Chi-Square test, Fisher Freeman Halton Test, and Yates' Continuity of Correction were used. Results: 3061 roots in 1801 teeth of 120 cases were analyzed. The mean age was 9.97±2.22 years. Dehiscence was detected in 261(8.5%) roots of 161(8.9%) teeth, and fenestration was detected 63(2%) roots of 36(2%) teeth. The most common fenestration type was Type I, followed by Type II and IV. Dehiscence was observed more frequently in primary teeth than permanent teeth, and the difference was statistically significant (p:0.000). Dehiscence and fenestration incidence in maxillary teeth was significantly higher than in the mandibular teeth (pdehiscence:0.000, pfenestration:0.004). Apical lesions were observed more in primary teeth than permanent teeth for both defects. Conclusion: This study concludes that alveolar dehiscence and fenestrations are more common in primary teeth than permanent teeth. Moreover, these defects were detected more for the teeth in the maxilla. Concerning endodontic and orthodontic therapies in maxilla, use of CBCT is useful in determining the region's anatomical structure accurately in suspected cases of child and adolescent patients.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUniversity Library System, University of Pittsburghen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAlveolar Bone Defecten_US
dc.subjectCone-Beam Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectDehiscenceen_US
dc.subjectFenestrationen_US
dc.subjectPrimary Toothen_US
dc.titleAssessment of dehiscence and fenestration in children and adolescents using cone beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofDentistry 3000en_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız, Diş ve Çene Radyolojisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Çocuk Diş Hekimliği Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-7931-4464en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-8440-367Xen_US
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5195/D3000.2021.143en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster