dc.contributor.author | Tuna, Abdulkadir | |
dc.contributor.author | Delilbaşı, Çağrı Barış | |
dc.contributor.author | Arslan, Ahmet Hamdi | |
dc.contributor.author | Gürol, Yeşim | |
dc.contributor.author | Tazegün Tekkanat, Zuhal | |
dc.date.accessioned | 10.07.201910:49:13 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-10T19:35:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 10.07.201910:49:14 | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-10T19:35:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Tuna, A., Delilbaşı, Ç. B., Arslan, A. H., Gürol, Y. ve Tazegun Tekkanat, Z. (2012). Do antibacterial mouthrinses affect bacteraemia in third molar surgery? A pilot study. Australian Dental Journal, 57(4), 435-439. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/adj.12003 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0045-0421 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/786 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/adj.12003 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the effects of mouthrinses containing 7.5% povidone iodine and 0.2% chlorhexidine on bacteraemia following impacted third molar surgery. Methods: Thirty-four patients were enrolled in this study. Patients in the first group were asked to rinse their mouth with the mouthrinse containing 7.5% povidone iodine, patients in the second group were asked to rinse with the mouthrinse containing 0.2% chlorhexidine and patients in the third group were asked to rinse with 0.9% NaCl (sterile saline) solution. All rinses were used for one minute preoperatively. Peripheral venous blood samples were collected at baseline (preoperatively), 1 and 15 minutes after the completion of surgical tooth removal. Each blood sample was divided in two, placed in aerobic and anaerobic culture bottles and processed for microbiological examination. Results: Bactaeremia was detected in 33% of the povidone iodine group, 33% of the chlorhexidine group and 50% of the control group. Isolated bacteria were 58% anaerobes and predominantly 92%Streptococcus species. Incidence of bacteraemia was reduced with chlorhexidine and povidone iodine mouthrinses in third molar surgery, although the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Bacteraemia was reduced with antibacterial mouthrinses in third molar surgery. The results of this study should be confirmed with further studies conducted on a larger patient population and with different antibacterial mouthrinses. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Bacteraemia | en_US |
dc.subject | Chlorhexidine | en_US |
dc.subject | Oral Surgery | en_US |
dc.subject | Povidone Iodine | en_US |
dc.subject | Third Molar Surgery | en_US |
dc.title | Do antibacterial mouthrinses affect bacteraemia in third molar surgery? A pilot study | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Australian Dental Journal | en_US |
dc.department | İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi Ana Bilim Dalı | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0003-3347-1151 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 57 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 435 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 439 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/adj.12003 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | en_US |