Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTuna, Abdulkadir
dc.contributor.authorDelilbaşı, Çağrı Barış
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Ahmet Hamdi
dc.contributor.authorGürol, Yeşim
dc.contributor.authorTazegün Tekkanat, Zuhal
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:35:27Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:14
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:35:27Z
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationTuna, A., Delilbaşı, Ç. B., Arslan, A. H., Gürol, Y. ve Tazegun Tekkanat, Z. (2012). Do antibacterial mouthrinses affect bacteraemia in third molar surgery? A pilot study. Australian Dental Journal, 57(4), 435-439. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/adj.12003en_US
dc.identifier.issn0045-0421
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/786
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/adj.12003
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the effects of mouthrinses containing 7.5% povidone iodine and 0.2% chlorhexidine on bacteraemia following impacted third molar surgery. Methods: Thirty-four patients were enrolled in this study. Patients in the first group were asked to rinse their mouth with the mouthrinse containing 7.5% povidone iodine, patients in the second group were asked to rinse with the mouthrinse containing 0.2% chlorhexidine and patients in the third group were asked to rinse with 0.9% NaCl (sterile saline) solution. All rinses were used for one minute preoperatively. Peripheral venous blood samples were collected at baseline (preoperatively), 1 and 15 minutes after the completion of surgical tooth removal. Each blood sample was divided in two, placed in aerobic and anaerobic culture bottles and processed for microbiological examination. Results: Bactaeremia was detected in 33% of the povidone iodine group, 33% of the chlorhexidine group and 50% of the control group. Isolated bacteria were 58% anaerobes and predominantly 92%Streptococcus species. Incidence of bacteraemia was reduced with chlorhexidine and povidone iodine mouthrinses in third molar surgery, although the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Bacteraemia was reduced with antibacterial mouthrinses in third molar surgery. The results of this study should be confirmed with further studies conducted on a larger patient population and with different antibacterial mouthrinses.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBacteraemiaen_US
dc.subjectChlorhexidineen_US
dc.subjectOral Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectPovidone Iodineen_US
dc.subjectThird Molar Surgeryen_US
dc.titleDo antibacterial mouthrinses affect bacteraemia in third molar surgery? A pilot studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Dental Journalen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-3347-1151en_US
dc.identifier.volume57en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage435en_US
dc.identifier.endpage439en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/adj.12003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster