Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorBayazıt, Yılmaz Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorKoşaner, Julie
dc.contributor.authorÇınar, Betül Çiçek
dc.contributor.authorAtaç, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorTutar, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorGündüz, Bülent
dc.contributor.authorAltınyay, Senay
dc.contributor.authorGökdoğa, Çağıl
dc.contributor.authorAnt, Ayça
dc.contributor.authorÖzdek, Ali
dc.contributor.authorGöksu, Nebil
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:35:24Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:14
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:35:24Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationBayazit, Y. A., Koşaner, J., Çınar, B. Ç., Ataç, A., Tutar, H., Gündüz, B. ... Göksu, N. (2014). Methods and preliminary outcomes of pediatric auditory brainstem implantation. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 123(8), 529-536. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0003489414525123en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-4894
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/756
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0003489414525123
dc.description.abstractObjective: The objective was to provide information about methods used and preliminary outcomes for pediatric ABI (auditory brainstem implant). Study Design: An analysis of outcome was performed in children who received an ABI. Methods: Twelve children received a MED-EL ABI system. Progress in audition and language was monitored through parental reports, questionnaires, profiles, and closed-set tests. Results: The median number of active electrodes was 9 of 12. Seven of 12 users consistently respond to sound, and 5 of 12 do not. Highest performers can recognize words in small sets and have begun to use some words. Conclusion: Auditory brainstem implants appear to be beneficial for some pediatric patients who cannot benefit from traditional cochlear implant surgery. Benefits in the short term can be recognition of environmental sounds, recognition of some words and very commonly used phrases, and the beginning use of words. Although some of our ABI users demonstrate no response to sound, they do want to wear their sound processors all waking hours. The cause of lack of response may be related to the second intervention, which might have led to displacement of the electrode array, or presence of additional handicaps or syndromes. However, the results are less than optimal. The relatively short postoperative follow-up duration is a considered weakness of this study.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAnnals Publishing Companyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAuditory Brainstem Implanten_US
dc.subjectInner Ear Malformationen_US
dc.subjectPrelingual Hearing Lossen_US
dc.titleMethods and preliminary outcomes of pediatric auditory brainstem implantationen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngologyen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Kulak Burun Boğaz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.identifier.volume123en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.startpage529en_US
dc.identifier.endpage536en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0003489414525123en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster