• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   [email protected]
  • Fakülteler
  • Uluslararası Tıp Fakültesi
  • Diğer Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   [email protected]
  • Fakülteler
  • Uluslararası Tıp Fakültesi
  • Diğer Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Contemporary patterns of presentation, diagnostics and management of upper tract urothelial cancer in 101 centres: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Global upper tract urothelial carcinoma registry

Thumbnail

View/Open

Tam Metin / Full Text (386.1Kb)

Access

info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess

Date

2021

Author

Baard, Joyce
Cormio, Luigi
Cavadas, Vítor
Alcaraz, Antonio
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
de la Rosette, Jean J. M. C. H.
Laguna, María Pilar

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

Baard, J., Cormio, L., Cavadas, V., Alcaraz, A., Shariat, S. F., de la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H. ... Laguna, M. P. (2021). Contemporary patterns of presentation, diagnostics and management of upper tract urothelial cancer in 101 centres: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Global upper tract urothelial carcinoma registry. Current Opinion in Urology, 31(4), 354-362. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000899

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To assess patterns of presentation, diagnostics and treatment in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a multicentre registry was launched. Clinical data of UTUC patients were prospectively collected over a 5-year period. RECENT FINDINGS: Data from 2380 patients were included from 2014 to 2019 (101 centres in 29 countries). Patients were predominantly male (70.5%) and 53.3% were past or present smokers. The majority of patients (58.1%) were evaluated because of symptoms, mainly macroscopic hematuria. Computed tomography (CT) was the most common performed imaging modality (90.5%). A ureteroscopy (URS) was part of the diagnostic process in 1184 (49.7%) patients and 488 (20.5%) patients were treated endoscopically. In total, 1430 patients (60.1%) were treated by a radical nephroureterectomy, 59% without a prior diagnostic URS. Eighty-two patients (3.4%) underwent a segmental resection, 19 patients (0.8%) were treated by a percutaneous tumour resection. SUMMARY: Our data is in line with the known epidemiologic characteristics of UTUC. CT imaging is the preferred imaging modality as also recommended by guidelines. Diagnostic URS gained a stronger position, however, in almost half of patients a definitive treatment decision was made without complete endoscopic information. Only one-third of patients with UTUC are currently treated with kidney sparing surgery.

WoS Q Kategorisi

Q3

xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-scopusquality

Q2

Source

Current Opinion in Urology

Volume

31

Issue

4

URI

https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000899
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/7130

Collections

  • Diğer Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [56]
  • PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [3474]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [5304]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [5526]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Guide | Contact |

[email protected]

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsInstitution AuthorORCIDTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryWoS Q ValueScopus Q ValuePublisherAccess TypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsInstitution AuthorORCIDTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryWoS Q ValueScopus Q ValuePublisherAccess Type

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Google Analytics Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Guide || Library || İstanbul Medipol University || OAI-PMH ||

Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı, İstabul, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact: [email protected]

Creative Commons License
[email protected] by İstanbul Medipol University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

[email protected]:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.