dc.contributor.author | Cesur Aydın, Kader | |
dc.contributor.author | Demirel, Oǧuzhan | |
dc.contributor.author | Özcan, Mutlu | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-12-21T11:54:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-12-21T11:54:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Cesur Aydın, K., Demirel, O. ve Özcan, M. (2020). Comparison of two digital intraoral radiography imaging systems as a function of contrast resolution and exposure time. Minerva Stomatologica, 69(3), 148-152. https://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04286-9 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0026-4970 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1827-174X | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04286-9 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/6119 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: To compare the image quality of two different digital imaging systems; one photostimulable phosphor plate system (PSP) and a direct digital radiography system with CMOS imaging sensor; via evaluating contrast resolution among four different exposure times. Methods: Endodontically treated incisor teeth embedded in paraffin blocks are aligned next to a 99.5% Al wedge and exposed for 0.8, 0.1,0.125 and 0.16 seconds using both the CMOS and PSP systems. Using ImageJ software, 5 isometric and isogridded ROI from each root filling area and isometric ROI from the Al stepwedge were calculated. Results: Evaluation of the total of 120 images displayed that PSP system produced significantly higher contrast resolution (P<0.05) in regard to pixel values than the CMOS. The CMOS system was non- responsive to increasing dose (P=0.000). Regarding the EqAl values, no significant difference was determined between groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: The contrast resolution was higher using the PSP system. It can be estimated that, filling material will be more obvious under lower doses using PSP. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Edizioni Minerva Medica | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Radiography | en_US |
dc.subject | Dental | en_US |
dc.subject | Technology | en_US |
dc.subject | Radiologic | en_US |
dc.subject | Diagnostic Equipment | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of two digital intraoral radiography imaging systems as a function of contrast resolution and exposure time | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Minerva Stomatologica | en_US |
dc.department | İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız, Diş ve Çene Radyolojisi Ana Bilim Dalı | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0002-6429-4197 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 69 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 148 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 152 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04286-9 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q3 | en_US |