Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKuyucu, Ersin
dc.contributor.authorKara, Adnan
dc.contributor.authorSay, Ferhat
dc.contributor.authorErdil, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorBülbül, Ahmet Murat
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-17T12:47:27Z
dc.date.available2020-07-17T12:47:27Z
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.identifier.citationKuyucu, E., Kara, A., Say, F., Erdil, M. ve Bülbül, A. M. (2017). Which unicondylar prosthesis is better in the mid-term in obese patients : Fixed or mobile? Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, 83(4), 679-683.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0001-6462
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/5560
dc.description.abstractAs it is mentioned in the literature, rates of complications and revision arc higher in the obese compared to non-obese patients, although obesity does not a contraindication for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and successful outcomes are achieved. However, there is not any study in the literature comparing the outcomes of fixed and mobile unicompartmental prostheses which are applied in the obese patients. Objective of this study was to compare outcomes of our obese patients who we applied fixed or mobile unicompartmental arthroplasty and followed up for 8 years and over.Of 293 patients in whom we performed unicompartmental knee prosthesis due to medial gonarthrosis between 2003 and 2014, 239 patients who were regularly followed-up at least for 18 months were included in this study. Total 248 knees with 193 (77.8%) fixed including bilateral prosthesis in 9 patients and 55 (22.2%) mobile prostheses were retrospectively assessed. The study included 57 patients having BMI >30 kg/ m2 who w ere regularly followed-up.In the final controls; mean flexion was found as 107 degrees (100-128 degrees)(p<0.05), mean extension as 3 degrees (0-5 degrees) and mean tibio femoral angle as 4 degrees (1-5 degrees) (p<0.05) valgus. Postoperative mean WOMAC value was found as 91.23 +/- 3.02 (92-96) (p<0.05) and mean KSS score as 88.3 +/- 3.94 (85-100) (p<0.05). In the final controls, respective knee flexions were seen to be 105 degrees (100-125 degrees) and 108 degrees(105-128 degrees) in the fixed and mobile insert subgroups (p>0.05).Unicompartmental knee prosthesis is a good treatment option which can be applied also in obese patients and has high survival rates. No significant difference was found between the prostheses with fixed and mobile insert in terms of function and knee scores. However, fixed unicompartmental prosthesis should primarily be preferred in obese patients because of the challenging surgical technique, difficult learning curve and insert dislocation that we encounter with mobile prostheses.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherActa Medica Belgicaen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectKnee Jointen_US
dc.subjectObesityen_US
dc.titleWhich unicondylar prosthesis is better in the mid-term in obese patients : Fixed or mobile?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Orthopaedica Belgicaen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-3976-9530en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-8437-5405en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-6742-8464en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-8053-2239en_US
dc.identifier.volume83en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage679en_US
dc.identifier.endpage683en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster