Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKaya, Faruk
dc.contributor.authorKoçak, İbrahim
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Ali
dc.contributor.authorBaybora, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorKarabela, Yunus
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-26T08:33:18Z
dc.date.available2020-06-26T08:33:18Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.citationKaya, F., Koçak, İ., Aydın, A., Baybora, H. ve Karabela, Y. (2015). Comparison of different formulas for intraocular lens power calculation using a new optical biometer. Journal Francais D Ophtalmologie, 38(8), 717-722. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2015.03.006en_US
dc.identifier.issn0181-5512
dc.identifier.issn1773-0597
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2015.03.006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/5320
dc.description.abstractPurpose. - To evaluate and compare the predictability of different formulas for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation using a new optical biometer (Aladdin). Methods. - This prospective cross-sectional study included 70 eyes of 70 patients who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification with IOL implantation. Preoperative IOL power calculations were performed using the Aladdin optical biometer. Postoperative actual refractive errors and errors predicted by the SRK/T, SRK II, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q and Haigis formulas were analyzed. The mean estimation error (EE), mean absolute estimation error (AEE) and the percentage of eyes within +/- 0.50 and +/- 1.00 D of the target refraction for each of five formulas were calculated and compared. This analysis was also repeated in three groups formed based on axial length (AL) (group 1: <22.5 mm, group 2: 22.5-24 mm, group 3: > 24 mm). Results. - In the overall study group, the smallest mean AEE was provided by the Holladay 1 formula, however there was no statistically significant difference in the mean AEE's predicted by the five formulas (P = 0.34). The highest percentage of eyes within +/- 0.50 and +/- 1.00 D of the target refraction was also found by using Holladay 1 (71% and 97%). SRK/T provided smallest mean AEE for groups 1 (n = 13) and 3 (n = 16). In group 2 (n = 41), the smallest mean AEE was obtained using Holladay 1. Conclusions. - Based on the Aladdin biometric data used in our study, better results can be obtained using SRK/T formula in eyes with short or long AL. The Holladay 1 formula may be preferred in eyes with moderate AL.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMasson Editeuren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectComparisonen_US
dc.subjectFormulasen_US
dc.subjectBiometeren_US
dc.titleComparison of different formulas for intraocular lens power calculation using a new optical biometeren_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Francais D Ophtalmologieen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Göz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-0972-3833en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-2267-6656en_US
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.startpage717en_US
dc.identifier.endpage722en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jfo.2015.03.006en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster