Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKoçak, İbrahim
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Ali
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Faruk
dc.contributor.authorKoç, Hacı
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-23T06:41:31Z
dc.date.available2020-06-23T06:41:31Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationKoçak, İ., Aydın, A., Kaya, F. ve Koç, H. (2014). Comparison of transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking with epithelium-off crosslinking in progressive keratoconus. Journal Francais D Ophtalmologie, 37(5), 371-376. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2013.11.012en_US
dc.identifier.issn0181-5512
dc.identifier.issn1773-0597
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2013.11.012
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/5285
dc.description.abstractPurpose. - To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking (TE-CXL) as compared to epithelium-off crosslinking (epi-off CXL) in progressive keratoconus. Methods. - Records of keratoconus patients treated with TE-CXL or epi-off CXL were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were included if they had at least 12 months follow-up. Pre- and postoperative measurements of visual acuity, refractive errors, keratometry, corneal topography and pachymetry were assessed and compared. Results. - There was no statistically significant difference between two groups at baseline in terms of demographic, refractive and corneal parameters. Mean maximum cone apex curvature (apical K) increased from 51.62 +/- 5. Eighty-four diopters (D) to 53.70 +/- 5.49 D in the TE-CXL group (n = 17), and decreased from 52.02 +/- 4.07 D to 51.22 +/- 3.51 in the epi-off CXL group (n = 19) at the end of the follow-up period. The difference between two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.0002). An increase of >= 1D in apical K was observed in two of 19 eyes (11%) in the epi-off CXL group, and 11 of 17 eyes (65%) in TE-CXL group at the last follow-up visit, compared to baseline (P < 0.0001). Fourteen patients in the epi-off CXL group exhibited corneal edema that resolved without haze with topical corticosteroid treatment by 4 months. No postoperative corneal edema was observed in TE-CXL group. Conclusions. - Although it is safe and well tolerated, TE-CXL does not effectively halt the progression of keratoconus. Epi-off CXL appears to be effective in stopping progression and even improves corneal parameters. (C) 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMasson Editeuren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectKeratoconusen_US
dc.subjectCorneal Collagen Crosslinkingen_US
dc.subjectTransepithelialen_US
dc.titleComparison of transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking with epithelium-off crosslinking in progressive keratoconusen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal Francais D Ophtalmologieen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Göz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-0972-3833en_US
dc.identifier.volume37en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage371en_US
dc.identifier.endpage376en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jfo.2013.11.012en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record