Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAmasyalı, Mihri
dc.contributor.authorAlakuş Sabuncuoğlu, Fidan
dc.contributor.authorErşahan, Şeyda
dc.contributor.authorOktay, Elif Aybala
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-27T08:54:06Z
dc.date.available2019-12-27T08:54:06Z
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.citationAmasyalı, M., Alakuş Sabuncuoğlu, F., Erşahan, Ş. ve Oktay, E. A. (2019). Comparison of the effects of various methods used to remove adhesive from tooth surfaces on surface roughness and temperature changes in the pulp chamber. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, 32(3), 132-138. https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18063en_US
dc.identifier.issn2148-9505
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18063
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/4764
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the effects of three methods of removing adhesive on enamel surface roughness and dental pulp temperature. Methods: Ninety human maxillary premolars were randomly divided into three groups (n=30) according to the type of adhesive clean-up procedure: aluminum oxide-based burs, erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser, and tungsten carbide bur. The surface roughness of enamel was measured using a non-contact optical profilometer. After the first readings of surface roughness were measured (T1), orthodontic brackets were attached to the enamel surface with composite. The brackets on the teeth were debonded using bracket removal pliers. The residue of adhesive was eliminated from the enamel surface of the teeth by different procedures in each group. While removing adhesive from the tooth surface, the intrapulpal temperature rise was simultaneously measured using a thermocouple. One-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey HSD tests were used to analyze data with a significance level set at 0.05. Results: The highest roughness average (Ra) values were observed for the Er:YAG laser group, with a significant difference with the aluminum oxide bur group and tungsten carbide bur group (p<0.001). Ra values for the aluminum oxide bur group were significantly lower than those for the other groups (p<0.001). Comparing the thermal changes in each group showed a significant decrease in the Er:YAG laser group, but a significant increase in two other groups. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, one-step finisher and polisher bur created the smoothest enamel surface, whereas Er:YAG laser the roughest. Tungsten carbide and aluminum oxide-based burs generated more heat than Er:YAG laser.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAVESen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectPulp Chamberen_US
dc.subjectTemperatureen_US
dc.subjectRemove Adhesiveen_US
dc.titleComparison of the effects of various methods used to remove adhesive from tooth surfaces on surface roughness and temperature changes in the pulp chamberen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalTurkish Journal of Orthodonticsen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-4716-948Xen_US
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage132en_US
dc.identifier.endpage138en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18063en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record