Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTekin, Alperen
dc.contributor.authorCesur Aydın, Kader
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-27T05:51:07Z
dc.date.available2019-12-27T05:51:07Z
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.citationTekin, A. ve Cesur Aydın, K. (2020). Comparative determination of skeletal maturity by hand–wrist radiograph, cephalometric radiograph and cone beam computed tomography. Oral Radiology, 36(4), 327-336. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-019-00408-yen_US
dc.identifier.issn0911-6028
dc.identifier.issn1613-9674
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-019-00408-y
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/4745
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The purpose of this study is to assess the stages of skeletal maturity in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), hand–wrist radiography (HWR) and cephalometric radiography (CR) techniques of orthodontic patients, and associate skeletal maturity stages with chronological age, in a Turkish subpopulation. Methods: Hand–wrist radiographs, cephalometric radiographs and CBCT of 105 patients were evaluated. For evaluation of HWR, the “Hand Bone Age A Digital Atlas of Skeletal Maturity” of Vicente Gilsanz and Osman Ratib (2005) was used. Skeletal maturation in the cephalometric radiographs and sagittal sections of cervical vertebrae obtained by CBCT were evaluated with Hassel and Farman’s method (1995). All results were re-evaluated 3 weeks later to assess intra-observer reliability. Results: Intra-observer reliability coefficients of the skeletal maturity stages in HWR, CR, and CBCT were 0.912, 0.595, 0.756 respectively (p < 0.05). Spearman’s correlation coefficient value between skeletal developmental stages in in HWR, CR, and CBCT was found to be 0.785, 0.875, and 0.791, respectively (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Results of this study reveal that the determination of the skeletal development status with analysis of cervical vertebrae using cephalometric radiographs and CBCT is as reliable method as the evaluation of the hand–wrist radiographs and is compatible with chronological age in a subgroup of the Turkish population. When assessing the skeletal development stages of patients, both CBCT and CR can be used validly, so no extra hand–wrist radiography is required. This information is important for the prevention of increased radiation doses in patients.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Verlagen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCephalometric Radiographen_US
dc.subjectChronological Ageen_US
dc.subjectCone Beam Computed Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectHand–Wrist Radiographen_US
dc.subjectSkeletal Ageen_US
dc.subjectSkeletal Maturationen_US
dc.titleComparative determination of skeletal maturity by hand–wrist radiograph, cephalometric radiograph and cone beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOral Radiologyen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız, Diş ve Çene Radyolojisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-0604-0287en_US
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage327en_US
dc.identifier.endpage336en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11282-019-00408-yen_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster