Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaramert, Recep
dc.contributor.authorEravcı, Fakih Cihat
dc.contributor.authorCebeci, Süleyman
dc.contributor.authorDüzlü, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorZorlu, Mehmet Ekrem
dc.contributor.authorGülhan, Nagihan
dc.contributor.authorTutar, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorUğur, Mehmet Birol
dc.contributor.authorİriz, Ayşe
dc.contributor.authorBayazıt, Yıldırım Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-26T17:40:23Z
dc.date.available2019-12-26T17:40:23Z
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.citationKaramert, R., Eravcı, F. C., Cebeci, S., Düzlü, M., Zorlu, M. E., Gülhan, N. ... Bayazıt, Y. A. (2019). Canal wall down versus canal wall up surgeries in the treatment of middle ear cholesteatoma. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 49(5), 1426-1432. http://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1904-109en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-0144
dc.identifier.issn1303-6165
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1904-109
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/4741
dc.description.abstractBackground/aim: To compare outcomes of canal wall up (CWU) and canal wall down (CWD) techniques in the treatment of middle ear cholesteatoma. Materials and methods: Medical records of 76 patients who had a primary surgery due to middle ear cholesteatoma between July 2015 and November 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Hearing thresholds, speech discrimination scores (SDS), recurrences, and revision surgeries of CWU and CWD surgeries were compared. Results: Of 76 cholesteatoma cases, 40 (52.6%) had a CWU and 36 (47.4%) had a CWD operation. Postoperatively, the mean air conduction thresholds were significantly better in CWU compared to CWD surgeries (P = 0.016). The presence of the stapes and the type of reconstruction material used did not have a significant effect on auditory success rates (P = 0.342 and P = 0.905, respectively). Auditory success was affected by the status of the middle ear mucosa as well. The recurrence and revision rates did not differ between the surgical techniques (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Status of the middle ear mucosa and external auditory canal are important factors affecting the outcomes in cholesteatoma. Instead of a CWD surgery, a CWU surgery seems applicable in cases of cholesteatoma when the bone in the external auditory canal is not eroded by the disease.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherThe Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK)en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectCholesteatomaen_US
dc.subjectMastoidectomyen_US
dc.subjectTympanoplastyen_US
dc.subjectOssicular Replacementen_US
dc.titleCanal wall down versus canal wall up surgeries in the treatment of middle ear cholesteatomaen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalTurkish Journal of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Kulak Burun Boğaz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-3887-4569en_US
dc.identifier.volume49en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1426en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1432en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3906/sag-1904-109en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess