dc.contributor.author | Oğuz Ahmet, Serra | |
dc.contributor.author | Eǧilmez, Ferhan | |
dc.contributor.author | Ergün, Gülfem | |
dc.contributor.author | Çekiç-Nagaş, Işıl | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-12-24T10:32:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-12-24T10:32:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Oğuz Ahmet, S., Eğilmez, F., Ergün, G. ve Çekiç Nagaş. I. (2019). Surface treatment effects on bond strength of CAD/CAM fabricated posts to root canal dentin. American Journal of Dentistry, 32(3), 113-117. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0894-8275 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/4647 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To compare the effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of CAD/CAM fabricated resin-based and prefabricated fiber posts to root canal dentin. Methods: 160 single-rooted human teeth were selected and received endodontic treatment. The teeth were divided into four groups according to the post material used: (1) Prefabricated fiber-reinforced composite post (Snowpost), (2) CAD/CAM nanoceramic (Cerasmart), (3) CAD/CAM polymer infiltrated ceramic (Vita Enamic) and (4) CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic (Lava Ultimate). Then the posts were randomly assigned into four sub-groups according to the surface treatment method used: (1) Control (no treatment), (2) Laser (Er,Cr:YSGG laser device, Waterlase), (3) Hydrofluoric acid treatment [9.6% HF (Pulpdent) for 2 minutes], and (4) Sandblasting (50 urn AI2O3). Following post space preparation, posts were cemented with dual-cure resin cement (Panavia SA cement plus). From each root, five 1 mm-thick slices were obtained. The micropush-out bond strength test was performed for each slice. Data were analyzed by using two-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests. The fracture modes were evaluated under a stereomicroscope. Representative specimens were analyzed with SEM following surface treatments. Results: Micropush-out bond strength of posts to dentin was significantly affected by the type of post material (P< 0.05), but not by the surface treatment (P= 0.397). | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Mosher and Linder, Inc | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Fiber Posts | en_US |
dc.subject | Glass-Fiber | en_US |
dc.subject | Self-Adhesive | en_US |
dc.subject | Resin Cements | en_US |
dc.title | Surface treatment effects on bond strength of CAD/CAM fabricated posts to root canal dentin | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | American Journal of Dentistry | en_US |
dc.department | İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0002-1387-2989 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 32 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 113 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 117 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | en_US |