Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTogay, Bilge
dc.contributor.authorÇıkrıkçılı, Uğur
dc.contributor.authorBayraktaroğlu, Zübeyir
dc.contributor.authorUslu, Atilla
dc.contributor.authorNoyan, Handan
dc.contributor.authorÜçok, Alp
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-20T09:10:13Z
dc.date.available2019-12-20T09:10:13Z
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.citationTogay, B., Çıkrıkçılı, U., Bayraktaroğlu, Z., Uslu, A., Noyan, H. ve Üçok, A. (2020). Lower prepulse inhibition in clinical high-risk groups but not in familial risk groups for psychosis compared with healthy controls. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 14(2), 196-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eip.12845en_US
dc.identifier.issn1751-7885
dc.identifier.issn1751-7893
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eip.12845
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/4578
dc.description.abstractAim: Although the lower level of prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle response is well known in schizophrenia, the onset of this difference is not clear. The aim of the present study was to compare PPI in individuals with clinical and familial high risk for psychosis, and healthy controls. Methods: We studied PPI in individuals within three groups: ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR, n = 29), familial high risk for psychosis (FHR, n = 24) and healthy controls (HC, n = 28). The FHR group was chosen among siblings of patients with schizophrenia, whereas UHR was defined based on the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS). We collected clinical data using the BPRS-E, SANS and SAPS when individuals with UHR were antipsychotic-naïve. A cognitive battery that assessed attention, cognitive flexibility, working memory, verbal learning and memory domains was applied to all participants. Results: PPI was lower in the UHR group compared with both the FHR and HC groups. Those with a positive family history for schizophrenia had lower PPI than others in the UHR group. There was no difference in PPI between the FHR and HC groups. We found no relationship between PPI and cognitive performance in the three groups. Startle reactivity was not different among the three groups. Positive and negative symptoms were not related to PPI and startle reactivity in the UHR group. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that clinical and familial high-risk groups for psychosis have different patterns of PPI.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Istanbul Universitesien_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectClinical High Risk for Psychosisen_US
dc.subjectCognitionen_US
dc.subjectFamilial Risk for Psychosisen_US
dc.subjectPrepulse Inhibitionen_US
dc.titleLower prepulse inhibition in clinical high-risk groups but not in familial risk groups for psychosis compared with healthy controlsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEarly Intervention in Psychiatryen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Uluslararası Tıp Fakültesi, Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Fizyoloji Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Rektörlük, Rejeneratif ve Restoratif Tıp Araştırmaları Merkezi (REMER)en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-5118-4776en_US
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage196en_US
dc.identifier.endpage202en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/eip.12845en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster