Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGüzelburç, Vahit
dc.contributor.authorBalasar, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorÇolakoğulları, Mukaddes
dc.contributor.authorGüven, Selçuk
dc.contributor.authorKandemir, Abdülkadir
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorKaraaslan, Pelin
dc.contributor.authorErkurt, Bülent
dc.contributor.authorAlbayrak, Selami
dc.identifier.citationGüzelburç, V., Balasar, M., Çolakoğulları, M., Güven, S.,Kandemir, A., Öztürk, A. ... Albayrak, S. (2016). Comparison of absorbed irrigation fluid volumes during retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones larger than 2 cm. SpringerPlus, 5.
dc.descriptionWOS: 000391804500002en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 27757377en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Irrigation-induced increase in intrarenal pressure is of concern because it may cause infection due to increased pyelovenous and pyelolymphatic absorption. This study is the first to compare prospectively the absorbed fluid volumes during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for stones larger than 2 cm. Materials and methods: General anesthesia was applied to all patients. Isotonic solution containing 1 % ethanol was used as irrigation fluid. Venous blood ethanol concentration was first measured with the start of irrigation and thereafter every 15 min until the patients left the recovery room. Absorbed fluid volumes were measured using the blood ethanol concentrations. Duration of irrigation, irrigated fluid volume, stone size and grade of hydronephrosis were also recorded. Results: A total of 60 patients were included the study. Fluid absorption occurred in all patients. Minimum and maximum ranges of fluid absorption were 20-573 mL for RIRS and 13-364 mL for PCNL. The increase in fluid absorbed volume was observed as a result of the given amount of irrigating fluid used in the PCNL group. Also prolongation of operation led to a significant increase in absorption in the PCNL group. Increase in body mass index, stone size, and hydronephrosis did not affect fluid absorption significantly in either of the two operation techniques in correlation analyzes. Conclusion: Both RIRS and PCNL are conducted under high pressure and can be accompanied potential complications such as SIRS. The fluid absorption confirmed in our study should be taken into consideration during RIRS and PCNL.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.subjectRenal Stoneen_US
dc.subjectFlexible Ureteroscopyen_US
dc.subjectPercutaneous Nephrolithotomyen_US
dc.subjectRetrograde Intrarenal Surgeryen_US
dc.titleComparison of absorbed irrigation fluid volumes during retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones larger than 2 cmen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Üroloji Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Tıbbi Biyokimya Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess