Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGümüştaş, Seyit Ali
dc.contributor.authorSağlam, Fevzi
dc.contributor.authorKömür, Baran
dc.contributor.authorBatmaz, Ahmet Güray
dc.contributor.authorYukunç, İsmail
dc.contributor.authorTosun, Hacı Bayram
dc.contributor.authorBekler, Halil İbrahim
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T20:02:09Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T20:02:09Z
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.identifier.citationGümüştaş, S. A., Sağlam, F., Kömür, B., Batmaz, A. G., Yukunç, İ., Tosun, H. B. ... Bekler, H. İ. (2018). Surgical treatment of type III acromioclavicular dislocation: Bosworth technique versus hook plating. Northern Clinics of İstanbul, 5(4), 334-340. https://dx.doi.org/10.14744/nci.2017.65037en_US
dc.identifier.issn2148-4902
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.14744/nci.2017.65037
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/3566
dc.descriptionWOS: 000453318400010en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 30859165en_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: In this study, it was compared the clinical results of the Bosworth technique and hook plating in acromioclavicular (AC) dislocations. METHODS: 44 patients are retrospectively evaluated in this study whom diagnosed as type III AC dislocations and treated by two different surgical methods in two different clinics. The patients were 30 males and 14 females with a mean age of 44 years (range, 18-80 years). The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the applied surgical technique. Group I comprised 25 patients to whom coracoclavicular fixation was applied by using the Bosworth technique. Group II comprised 19 patients to whom acromioclavicular fixation was applied by using hook plate. All patients are evaulated by The University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Score (UCLA) and The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) scoring system. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 23 months (range, 12-42 months). A statistically significant diffference was determined between the surgical groups in respect of the modified UCLA scale (p=0.012) and Quick DASH score (p=0.008). Hook plating group had better clinical results according to Bosworth group in terms of both UCLA and DASH score. A statistically highly significant negative correlation was determined between the UCLA and DASH scores (r=0.677, p=0.000). CONCLUSION: Although hook plating had better clinic outcomes compared to Bosworth technique, there is not seen difference between two groups in terms of the time of return to work. Treatment of the AC dislocation should perform early reconstruction for better reduction, fewer complications and higher levels of patient satisfaction.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKare Publishingen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAcromioclavicular Dislocationen_US
dc.subjectBosworth Techniqueen_US
dc.subjectFixationen_US
dc.subjectHook Platingen_US
dc.subjectResultsen_US
dc.titleSurgical treatment of type III acromioclavicular dislocation: Bosworth technique versus hook platingen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalNorthern Clinics of İstanbulen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-9283-582Xen_US
dc.identifier.volume5en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage334en_US
dc.identifier.endpage340en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/nci.2017.65037en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record