Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSönmez, Mesut Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorÇamur, Savas
dc.contributor.authorErtürer, Erden
dc.contributor.authorUğurlar, Meriç
dc.contributor.authorKara, Adnan
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, İrfan
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T20:01:31Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T20:01:31Z
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.identifier.citationSönmez, M. M., Çamuri S., Ertürer, E., Uğurlar, M., Kara, A. ve Öztürk, İ. (2017). Strategies for proximal femoral nailing of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: Lateral decubitus position or traction table. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 25(3), E37-E44. https://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00691en_US
dc.identifier.issn1067-151X
dc.identifier.issn1940-5480
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00691
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/3318
dc.descriptionWOS: 000404858500001en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 28134676en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the traction table and lateral decubitus position techniques in the management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Methods: Eighty-two patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures between 2011 and 2013 were included in this study. All patients were treated surgically with the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation implant (DePuy Synthes). Patients were randomized to undergo the procedure in the lateral decubitus position (42 patients) or with the use of a traction table (40 patients). Patients whose procedure was not performed entirely with a semi-invasive method or who required the use of additional fixation materials, such as cables, were excluded from the study. The groups were compared on the basis of the setup time, surgical time, fluoroscopic exposure time, tip-to-apex distance, collodiaphyseal angle, and modified Baumgaertner criteria for radiologic reduction. Results: The setup time, surgical time, and fluoroscopic exposure time were lower and the differences were statistically significant in the lateral decubitus group compared with the traction table group. The collodiaphyseal angles were significantly different between the groups in favor of the lateral decubitus method. The tip-to-apex distance and the classification of reduction according to the modified Baumgaertner criteria did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference between the groups. Conclusions: The lateral decubitus position is used for most open procedures of the hip. We found that this position facilitates exposure for the surgical treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures and has advantages over the traction table in terms of set up time, surgical time and fluoroscopic exposure time.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectStrategies for Proximal Femoral Nailingen_US
dc.subjectIntertrochanteric Fracturesen_US
dc.subjectLateral Decubitus Positionen_US
dc.subjectTraction Tableen_US
dc.titleStrategies for proximal femoral nailing of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: Lateral decubitus position or traction tableen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeonsen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-8437-5405en_US
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpageE37en_US
dc.identifier.endpageE44en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00691en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record