Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorBilgehan, Fatma
dc.contributor.authorDilbaz, Berna
dc.contributor.authorKaradaǧ, Burak
dc.contributor.authorDeveci, Canan Dura
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:58:49Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:58:49Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.citationBilgehan, F., Dilbaz, B., Karadaǧ, B. ve Deveci, C. D. (2015). Comparison of copper intrauterine device with levonorgestrel-bearing intrauterine system for post-abortion contraception. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 41(9), 1426-1432. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.12747en_US
dc.identifier.issn1341-8076
dc.identifier.issn1447-0756
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.12747
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/3231
dc.descriptionWOS: 000362674400018en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 26180028en_US
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of this study was to compare the safety, bleeding pattern, effects, side-effects, complications and 6-month continuity rates of levonorgestrel-bearing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) with conventional copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) inserted immediately after voluntary termination of pregnancy up to 10weeks of gestation. Methods: One hundred women who underwent voluntary pregnancy termination and preferred IUD insertion as a contraceptive method after counseling were enrolled. The patients were randomly allocated to Cu-IUD or LNG-IUS and followed up at 10 days, and at 1, 3 and 6 months. The expulsion rates, continuation rates, side-effects, and bleeding patterns were compared. Results: Fifty women in the Cu-IUD group and 44 women in the LNG-IUS group were followed up. The continuity and expulsion rate for Cu-IUD and LNG-IUS at the end of 6months was 74%, 12%, and 75%, 11.3%, respectively. In LNG-IUS users, the incidence of amenorrhea and the number of spotting days were higher and hemoglobin increased throughout the follow-up period. The side-effects related to both methods were not different from interval insertions. Conclusion: Immediate post-abortion intrauterine contraception with Cu-IUD or LNG-IUS is a safe, reliable method. The incidence of side-effects is similar, and there is only a slightly higher rate of expulsion but an acceptable rate of method continuation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishingen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCopper Intrauterine Deviceen_US
dc.subjectLevonorgestrel-Bearing Intrauterine Systemen_US
dc.subjectMethod Continuityen_US
dc.subjectPost-Abortion Contraceptionen_US
dc.titleComparison of copper intrauterine device with levonorgestrel-bearing intrauterine system for post-abortion contraceptionen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Researchen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1426en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1432en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jog.12747en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster