dc.contributor.author | Bilgehan, Fatma | |
dc.contributor.author | Dilbaz, Berna | |
dc.contributor.author | Karadaǧ, Burak | |
dc.contributor.author | Deveci, Canan Dura | |
dc.date.accessioned | 10.07.201910:49:13 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-10T19:58:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 10.07.201910:49:13 | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-10T19:58:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Bilgehan, F., Dilbaz, B., Karadaǧ, B. ve Deveci, C. D. (2015). Comparison of copper intrauterine device with levonorgestrel-bearing intrauterine system for post-abortion contraception. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 41(9), 1426-1432. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.12747 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1341-8076 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1447-0756 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.12747 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/3231 | |
dc.description | WOS: 000362674400018 | en_US |
dc.description | PubMed ID: 26180028 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the safety, bleeding pattern, effects, side-effects, complications and 6-month continuity rates of levonorgestrel-bearing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) with conventional copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) inserted immediately after voluntary termination of pregnancy up to 10weeks of gestation. Methods: One hundred women who underwent voluntary pregnancy termination and preferred IUD insertion as a contraceptive method after counseling were enrolled. The patients were randomly allocated to Cu-IUD or LNG-IUS and followed up at 10 days, and at 1, 3 and 6 months. The expulsion rates, continuation rates, side-effects, and bleeding patterns were compared. Results: Fifty women in the Cu-IUD group and 44 women in the LNG-IUS group were followed up. The continuity and expulsion rate for Cu-IUD and LNG-IUS at the end of 6months was 74%, 12%, and 75%, 11.3%, respectively. In LNG-IUS users, the incidence of amenorrhea and the number of spotting days were higher and hemoglobin increased throughout the follow-up period. The side-effects related to both methods were not different from interval insertions. Conclusion: Immediate post-abortion intrauterine contraception with Cu-IUD or LNG-IUS is a safe, reliable method. The incidence of side-effects is similar, and there is only a slightly higher rate of expulsion but an acceptable rate of method continuation. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Copper Intrauterine Device | en_US |
dc.subject | Levonorgestrel-Bearing Intrauterine System | en_US |
dc.subject | Method Continuity | en_US |
dc.subject | Post-Abortion Contraception | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of copper intrauterine device with levonorgestrel-bearing intrauterine system for post-abortion contraception | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research | en_US |
dc.department | İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Ana Bilim Dalı | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 41 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 9 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 1426 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 1432 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/jog.12747 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | en_US |