dc.contributor.author | Kiremit, Murat Can | |
dc.contributor.author | Güven, Selçuk | |
dc.contributor.author | Sarıca, Kemal | |
dc.contributor.author | Öztürk, Ahmet | |
dc.contributor.author | Buldu, İbrahim | |
dc.contributor.author | Kafkaslı, Alper | |
dc.contributor.author | Balasar, Mehmet | |
dc.contributor.author | İstanbulluoğlu, Okan | |
dc.contributor.author | Horuz, Rahim | |
dc.contributor.author | Çetinel, Cihangir Ali | |
dc.contributor.author | Kandemir, Abdulkadir | |
dc.contributor.author | Albayrak, Selami | |
dc.date.accessioned | 10.07.201910:49:13 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-10T19:58:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 10.07.201910:49:13 | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-10T19:58:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Kiremit, M. C., Güven, S., Sarıca, K., Öztürk, A., Buldu, İ., Kafkaslı, A. ... Albayrak, S. (2015). Contemporary management of medium-sized (10-20mm) renal stones: A retrospective multicenter observational study. JournalL of Endourology, 29(7), 838-843. https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0698 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0892-7790 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1557-900X | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0698 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/3100 | |
dc.description | WOS: 000362081600015 | en_US |
dc.description | PubMed ID: 25578510 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To evaluate contemporary management approaches to medium-sized (10-20mm) renal stones. Patients and Methods: A total of 935 patients treated for medium-sized renal stones (10-20mm) between July 2012 and March 2014 were included in the study program. Contemporary minimally invasive approaches applied in the management of such stones were evaluated and compared. Results: The cohort consisted of 561 male (60%) and 374 female (40%) patients. Of the 935 patients with medium-sized renal calculi, 535 (57.2%) were treated with shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), 201 (21.4%) with retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), 110 (11.7%) with minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (miniperc), and the remaining 89 (11.7%) patients with micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc). In the SWL group, stones were located mostly in the pelvis (51%), while in the miniperc and microperc groups, they were located mainly in the lower pole (46%, 53%, respectively). Stone-free rates after a single session were 77.2%, 86.1%, 88.8%, and 83.6% in the SWL, RIRS, microperc, and miniperc groups, respectively. Although no serious complications (above Clavien level III) were noted in any of the groups evaluated, Clavien I to II complications were common in the miniperc group. Conclusion: Although SWL is the preferred treatment option for patients with medium-sized (10-20mm) renal stones, endourologic methods also have been found to have a significant role. Relatively lower complication rates along with higher stone-free status observed with the RIRS technique compared with percutaneous approaches have made this method a valuable option in the management of such stones in recent years. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Mary Ann Liebert | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Contemporary Management | en_US |
dc.subject | Renal Stones | en_US |
dc.subject | Retrospective | en_US |
dc.subject | Multicenter | en_US |
dc.title | Contemporary management of medium-sized (10-20mm) renal stones: A retrospective multicenter observational study | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Endourology | en_US |
dc.department | İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Üroloji Ana Bilim Dalı | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0002-5009-8435 | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0001-8014-2321 | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0002-4245-7506 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 29 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 7 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 838 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 843 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1089/end.2014.0698 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | en_US |