Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKiremit, Murat Can
dc.contributor.authorGüven, Selçuk
dc.contributor.authorSarıca, Kemal
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorBuldu, İbrahim
dc.contributor.authorKafkaslı, Alper
dc.contributor.authorBalasar, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorİstanbulluoğlu, Okan
dc.contributor.authorHoruz, Rahim
dc.contributor.authorÇetinel, Cihangir Ali
dc.contributor.authorKandemir, Abdulkadir
dc.contributor.authorAlbayrak, Selami
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:58:03Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:58:03Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.citationKiremit, M. C., Güven, S., Sarıca, K., Öztürk, A., Buldu, İ., Kafkaslı, A. ... Albayrak, S. (2015). Contemporary management of medium-sized (10-20mm) renal stones: A retrospective multicenter observational study. JournalL of Endourology, 29(7), 838-843. https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0698en_US
dc.identifier.issn0892-7790
dc.identifier.issn1557-900X
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0698
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/3100
dc.descriptionWOS: 000362081600015en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 25578510en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate contemporary management approaches to medium-sized (10-20mm) renal stones. Patients and Methods: A total of 935 patients treated for medium-sized renal stones (10-20mm) between July 2012 and March 2014 were included in the study program. Contemporary minimally invasive approaches applied in the management of such stones were evaluated and compared. Results: The cohort consisted of 561 male (60%) and 374 female (40%) patients. Of the 935 patients with medium-sized renal calculi, 535 (57.2%) were treated with shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), 201 (21.4%) with retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), 110 (11.7%) with minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (miniperc), and the remaining 89 (11.7%) patients with micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc). In the SWL group, stones were located mostly in the pelvis (51%), while in the miniperc and microperc groups, they were located mainly in the lower pole (46%, 53%, respectively). Stone-free rates after a single session were 77.2%, 86.1%, 88.8%, and 83.6% in the SWL, RIRS, microperc, and miniperc groups, respectively. Although no serious complications (above Clavien level III) were noted in any of the groups evaluated, Clavien I to II complications were common in the miniperc group. Conclusion: Although SWL is the preferred treatment option for patients with medium-sized (10-20mm) renal stones, endourologic methods also have been found to have a significant role. Relatively lower complication rates along with higher stone-free status observed with the RIRS technique compared with percutaneous approaches have made this method a valuable option in the management of such stones in recent years.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMary Ann Lieberten_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectContemporary Managementen_US
dc.subjectRenal Stonesen_US
dc.subjectRetrospectiveen_US
dc.subjectMulticenteren_US
dc.titleContemporary management of medium-sized (10-20mm) renal stones: A retrospective multicenter observational studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Endourologyen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Üroloji Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-5009-8435en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-8014-2321en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-4245-7506en_US
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.startpage838en_US
dc.identifier.endpage843en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/end.2014.0698en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record