Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSakallıoğlu, Öner
dc.contributor.authorCingi, Cemal
dc.contributor.authorPolat, Cahit
dc.contributor.authorSoylu, Erkan
dc.contributor.authorAkyiǧit, Abdulvahap
dc.contributor.authorSöken, Hakan
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:57:54Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:57:54Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationSakallıoğlu, Ö., Cingi, C., Polat, C., Soylu, E., Akyiǧit, A. ve Söken, H. (2015). Open versus closed septorhinoplasty approaches for postoperative edema and ecchymosis. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 4, 1334-1337. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001715en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.issn1536-3732
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001715
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/3068
dc.descriptionWOS: 000357569600128en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 26080189en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to compare periorbital edema and ecchymosis seen after closed (endonasal) and open (external) septorhinoplasty (SRP). Methods: In total, 50 patients undergoing hump extraction and osteotomies were allocated to 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of 25 patients who underwent closed SRP. Group 2 consisted of 25 patients who underwent open SRP. Operation time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, and complications were recorded. Scoring of eyelid edema and periorbital ecchymosis was evaluated on the first, third, and seventh postoperative days using a scale of 0 to 4 by the first author. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of age, sex, or operation time. No significant difference was observed clinically or statistically in the scores of periorbital edema or ecchymosis between groups 1 and 2 on the first, third, and seventh postoperative days (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The authors observed no clinically or statistically significant difference in comparing periorbital edema and ecchymosis seen after closed and open SRP.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkinsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectComplicationen_US
dc.subjectEcchymosisen_US
dc.subjectEdemaen_US
dc.subjectOsteotomyen_US
dc.subjectSeptorhinoplastyen_US
dc.titleOpen versus closed septorhinoplasty approaches for postoperative edema and ecchymosisen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Craniofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Kulak Burun Boğaz Hastalıkları Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1334en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1337en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0000000000001715en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record