Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorYüzbaşıoğlu, Emir
dc.contributor.authorSayar Torun, Gülsilay
dc.contributor.authorÖzcan, Mutlu
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:57:14Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:57:14Z
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.citationYüzbaşıoğlu, E., Sayar Torun, G. ve Özcan, M. (2016). Adhesion of orthodontic brackets to indirect laboratory-processed resin composite as a function of surface conditioning methods and artificial aging. Journal Of Adhesıon Science And Technology, 30(23), 2565-2572. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1186327en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-4243
dc.identifier.issn1568-5616
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1186327
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/2932
dc.descriptionWOS: 000379137300004en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study compared the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to laboratory-processed indirect resin composites (IRC) after different surface conditioning methods and aging. Specimens made of IRC (Gradia Indirect, GC) (thickness: 2 mm; diameter: 10 mm) (N = 80) were randomly assigned to one of the following surface conditioning methods: C-Control: no treatment; AA - Air-abrasion (50 mu m Al2O3 particles); DB-Diamond bur and HF - Etching with hydrofluoric acid (9.6%). After adhesive primer application (Transbond XT), orthodontic brackets were bonded to the conditioned IRC specimens using adhesive resin (Transbond XT). Following storage in artificial saliva for 24 h at 37 degrees C, the specimens were thermocycled (x1000, 5-55 degrees C). The IRC-bracket interface was loaded under shear in a Universal Testing Machine (0.5 mm/min). Failure types were classified using modified adhesive remnant index criteria. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD (alpha = 0.05). Surface conditioning method did not significantly affect the bond strength results (p = 0.2020), but aging significantly decreased the results (p = 0.04). Interaction terms were not significant (p = 0.775). In both non-aged and aged conditions, non-conditioned C group presented the lowest bond strength results (MPa) (p < 0.05). In non-aged conditions, surface conditioning with DB (8.03 +/- 0.77) and HF (7.87 +/- 0.64) showed significantly higher bond strength results compared to those of other groups (p < 0.05). Thermocycling significantly decreased the mean bond strength in all groups (2.24 +/- 0.36-6.21 +/- 0.59) (p < 0.05). The incidence of Score 5 (all adhesive resin remaining on the specimen) was the highest in HF group without (80%) and with aging (80%) followed by DB (40, 70%, respectively). C groups without and with aging showed exclusively Score 1 type (no adhesive resin on the specimen) of failures indicating the least reliable type of adhesion.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAdhesionen_US
dc.subjectAgingen_US
dc.subjectBond Strengthen_US
dc.subjectIndirect Resin Compositeen_US
dc.subjectOrthodontic Bracketsen_US
dc.subjectSurface Conditioningen_US
dc.titleAdhesion of orthodontic brackets to indirect laboratory-processed resin composite as a function of surface conditioning methods and artificial agingen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Adhesıon Science And Technologyen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-5348-6954en_US
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.issue23en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2565en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2572en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01694243.2016.1186327en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster