Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorŞener Yamaner, Işıl Damla
dc.contributor.authorSertgöz, Atilla
dc.contributor.authorToz Akalın, Tuğba
dc.contributor.authorÖzcan, Mutlu
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:57:12Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:57:12Z
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.identifier.citationŞener Yamaner, I. D., Sertgöz, A., Toz Akalın, T. ve Özcan, M. (2017). Effect of material and fabrication technique on marginal fit and fracture resistance of adhesively luted inlays made of CAD/CAM ceramics and hybrid materials. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 31(1), 55-70. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1204144en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-4243
dc.identifier.issn1568-5616
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1204144
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/2925
dc.descriptionWOS: 000386328700006en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated the fracture resistance and marginal fit of CAD/CAM ceramic and composite inlays. Molars (N=80) were prepared to receive Mesio-occlusal-distal (MOD) inlays and randomly divided into four groups to be restored depending on the materials: (a) HLD: heat-pressed lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS e.max Press), (b) CLD: CAD/CAM-fabricated lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS e.max CAD), (c) NC: CAD/CAM nano-ceramic resin (Lava Ultimate), (d) RC: Indirect resin composite (Filtek P60). Each group was randomly divided into two subgroups regarding the resin cement: (a) High-viscosity resin cement (Syntac, Variolink II), (b) Self-adhesive low-viscosity cement (RelyX Ultimate). After marginal gap and cement thickness measurements, specimens were loaded to fracture in a Universal Testing Machine (1mm/min). Intact molars acted as the control group (n=10). Data were analyzed using one-way and two-way ANOVA, Tukey's tests (=0.05). Before cementation, CLD group showed significantly lower mean marginal gap (65 +/- 22.4m) and after cementation, cement thickness was again the lowest with CLD (82.6 +/- 24.6m) and the highest with HLD (108.4 +/- 21.3m) (p<0.001). The mean marginal gaps of inlays at the gingival margin were significantly higher than at the occlusal and the axial margins (p<0.05). While material type significantly affected the mean fracture resistance (p<0.001), the cement type had no effect on the results (p=0.083). NC group (2486 +/- 40N) showed significantly higher mean fracture load compared to those of other three groups (1997.5 +/- 60-2007 +/- 30) (p<0.05). The mean fracture resistance of control group with the intact teeth was significantly higher than those of all groups (p<0.05) except for NC (p>0.05).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCADen_US
dc.subjectCAMen_US
dc.subjectCement Thicknessen_US
dc.subjectMarginal Gapen_US
dc.subjectNano-Ceramic Resin Compositeen_US
dc.subjectResin Cementen_US
dc.subjectInlayen_US
dc.titleEffect of material and fabrication technique on marginal fit and fracture resistance of adhesively luted inlays made of CAD/CAM ceramics and hybrid materialsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Adhesion Science and Technologyen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage55en_US
dc.identifier.endpage70en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01694243.2016.1204144en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record