• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace@Medipol
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace@Medipol
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparison of tunnel and crestal incision techniques in reconstruction of localized alveolar defects

Thumbnail

View/Open

Tam Metin / Full Text (289.2Kb)

Access

info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess

Date

2017

Author

Altıparmak, Nur
Uçkan, Sina
Bayram, Burak
Soydan, Sıdıka

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

Altıparmak, N., Uçkan, S., Bayram, B. ve Soydan, S. (2017). Comparison of tunnel and crestal incision techniques in reconstruction of localized alveolar defects. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 32(5), 1103-1110. https://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5275

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the complication rates of recipient sites prepared using two incision techniques: crestal and tunnel. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, patients underwent augmentation procedures (68 patients; 75 sites) by the same surgeon that were performed consecutively using the crestal incision technique (27 horizontal, 10 vertical; crestal group) or the tunnel incision technique (27 horizontal, 11 vertical; tunnel group). Autogenous bone block grafts were harvested with a piezoelectric surgical device, and the grafts were fixed at the recipient sites by two titanium screws in both groups. The authors evaluated minor exposure, transient paresthesia, major exposure, permanent paresthesia, gingival recession at adjacent teeth, surgery time, and visual analog scale pain scores. Results: Soft tissue dehiscence and graft failure were significantly lower in patients undergoing the tunnel technique. Conclusion: The tunnel incision technique significantly decreased soft tissue exposure, the most common complication of augmentation procedures with autogenous onlay bone grafts. This technique should be considered an alternative to the crestal incision technique for preparation of the recipient site.

WoS Q Kategorisi

Q2

xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-scopusquality

Q1

Source

International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants

Volume

32

Issue

5

URI

https://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5275
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/2808

Collections

  • Makale Koleksiyonu [516]
  • PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [3748]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [5788]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [5966]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Guide | Contact |

DSpace@Medipol

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsInstitution AuthorORCIDTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryWoS Q ValueScopus Q ValuePublisherAccess TypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsInstitution AuthorORCIDTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryWoS Q ValueScopus Q ValuePublisherAccess Type

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Google Analytics Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Guide || Library || İstanbul Medipol University || OAI-PMH ||

Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı, İstabul, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact: [email protected]

Creative Commons License
DSpace@Medipol by İstanbul Medipol University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Medipol:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.