Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGüneş, Hacı Murat
dc.contributor.authorKızılırmak Yılmaz, Filiz
dc.contributor.authorGökdeniz, Tayyar
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Gültekin Günhan
dc.contributor.authorGüler, Ekrem
dc.contributor.authorBabür Güler, Gamze
dc.contributor.authorKaraca, Oğuz
dc.contributor.authorÇakal, Beytullah
dc.contributor.authorİbişoğlu, Ersin
dc.contributor.authorBoztosun, Bilal
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:56:32Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:56:32Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationGüneş, H. M., Kızılırmak Yılmaz, F., Gökdeniz, T., Demir, G. G., Güler, E., Babür Güler, G. ... Boztosun, B. (2016). Is bioresorbable vascular scaffold acute recoil affected by baseline renal function and scaffold selection? International Journal Of Cardiology, 224, 388-393. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.024en_US
dc.identifier.issn0167-5273
dc.identifier.issn1874-1754
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.024
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/2739
dc.descriptionWOS: 000390471300070en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 27681252en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and acute post-scaffold recoil (PSR) in patients undergoing bioresorbable scaffold (BVS) implantation. Methods: We included 130 patients who underwent everolimus-eluting BVS device (Absorb BVS; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) or the novolimus-eluting BVS device (Elixir Medical Corporation) implantations for single or multi-vessel disease. Clinical, angiographic variables and procedural characteristics were defined and pre-procedural GFR was calculated for each patient. Post-procedural angiographic parameters of each patient were analyzed. Primary objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of GFR on angiographic outcomes after BVS implantation while secondary objective was to compare post-procedural angiographic results between the two BVS device groups. Results: Baseline clinical characteristics and angiographic parameters were similar between the two BVS groups. Post-procedural angiographic analysis revealed significantly lower PSR in the DESolve group than the Absorb group (0.10 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.13 +/- 0.05, p: 0.003). When PSR in the whole study population was evaluated, it was positively correlated with age, tortuosity, calcification and PBR as there was a negative correlation between GFR. Besides GFR were found to be independent predictors for PSR in all groups and the whole study population. Conclusion: In patients undergoing BVS implantation, pre-procedural low GFR is associated with increased post-procedural PSR. Calcification, age, PBR, dyslipidemia and tortuosity are other independent risk factors for PSR. DESolve has lower PSR when compared with Absorb.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBioresorbable Vascular Scaffolden_US
dc.subjectGlomerular Filtration Rateen_US
dc.subjectStent Recoilingen_US
dc.titleIs bioresorbable vascular scaffold acute recoil affected by baseline renal function and scaffold selection?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal Of Cardiologyen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Kardiyoloji Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-1919-3183en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-9975-5507en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-4607-5724en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-4281-0867en_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-0230-6575en_US
dc.identifier.volume224en_US
dc.identifier.startpage388en_US
dc.identifier.endpage393en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.024en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record