Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorÖzyüksel, Arda
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:56:28Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:56:28Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.citationÖzyüksel, A. (2015). EComment. Evidence, experience or novelty for achieving the best outcome in surgery? Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 21(2), 245. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivv168en_US
dc.identifier.issn1569-9293
dc.identifier.issn1569-9285
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivv168
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/2716
dc.descriptionWOS: 000359699400022en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 26203131en_US
dc.description.abstractI read with great interest the article by Cuttone and colleagues [1]. They reported a unique surgical treatment strategy for the management of circumflex coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) in an adult presenting with myocardial ischaemia. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is an important etiology for CAA formation in adults; however, connective tissue disorders and Kawasaki disease may lead to multiple giant CAAs in children [2]. Although rarely encountered, the cases with CAA present with technical challenges when interventional or surgical treatment modalities are concerned. Boyer and colleagues reviewed the literature and ACC/AHA acute coronary syndrome guidelines recently and the following indications were stated as the indications for surgical revascularization in CAA: (i) CAA involving the left main coronary artery, (ii) multivessel CAD, (iii) giant CAA (the diameter of CAA exceeding the reference vessel diameter by 4 times), (iv) CAA involving bifurcation of significant sidebranch vessel and (v) other separate indications for cardiothoracic surgery unrelated to CAA [3]. The surgical indication for this case is questionable in my opinion, unless the stenotic lesion at the right coronary artery deemed a surgical revascularization necessary. When the diameter and the location of the CAA is considered, this case seems to be manageable by percutaneous intervention with regard to the abovementioned criteria. Boyer et al. also mention that surgical revascularization is considered reasonable in cases where the PTFE-coated, bare metal or drug eluting stents cannot be delivered across the lesion [3]. In this case, the CAA was demonstrated to be thrombus free, which would provide safer circumstances for a covered, bare or drug eluting stent delivery.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectECommenten_US
dc.subjectEvidenceen_US
dc.subjectNoveltyen_US
dc.titleeComment. Evidence, experience or novelty for achieving the best outcome in surgery?en_US
dc.typeletteren_US
dc.relation.journalInteractive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgeryen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü, Kalp ve Damar Cerrahisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-7478-6235en_US
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage245en_US
dc.identifier.endpage245en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/icvts/ivv168en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record