Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDelilbaşı, Barış Çağrı
dc.contributor.authorGürler, Gökhan
dc.date.accessioned10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T19:56:23Z
dc.date.available10.07.201910:49:13
dc.date.available2019-07-10T19:56:23Z
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.citationDelilbaşı, B. Ç. ve Gürler, G. (2013). Comparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotative instruments in direct sinus lifting. Implant Dentistry, 22(16), 662-665. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000001en_US
dc.identifier.issn1056-6163
dc.identifier.issn1538-2982
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/2685
dc.descriptionWOS: 000329923600019en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 24168901en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives:The purpose of this study was to compare the intraoperative and postoperative effects of Piezosurgery and conventional rotative instruments in direct sinus lifting procedure.Patients and Methods:Twenty-three patients requiring direct sinus lifting were enrolled. The osteotomy and sinus membrane elevation were performed either with Piezosurgery tips or rotative diamond burs and manual membrane elevators. Time elapsed between bony window opening and completion of membrane elevation (duration), incidence of membrane perforation, visibility of the operation site, postoperative pain, swelling, sleeping, eating, phonetics, daily routine, and missed work as well as patient's expectation before and experience after the operation were evaluated.Results:There was no significant difference between Piezosurgery and conventional groups regarding incidence of membrane perforation, duration, and operation site visibility as well as patient's expectation before and experience after the operation (P > 0.05). However, there were significantly more pain and swelling in the conventional group compared with the Piezosurgery group (P 0.05).Conclusion:Sinus lifting procedure performed with Piezosurgery causes less pain and swelling postoperatively compared with conventional technique. Patients' daily life activities and experience about the operation are not affected from the surgical technique.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLıppincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectPiezosurgeryen_US
dc.subjectSinus Liften_US
dc.subjectRotative Instrumentsen_US
dc.subjectSwellingen_US
dc.subjectPainen_US
dc.titleComparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotative instruments in direct sinus liftingen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalImplant Dentistryen_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-6705-3110en_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-3347-1151en_US
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage662en_US
dc.identifier.endpage665en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/ID.0000000000000001en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record